- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:56 am to BayouBlitz
Invidious discrimination means discrimination on the basis of sex, race, religion, or national origin, which is arbitrary, capricious, without reasonable foundation, or is otherwise of the general type and nature that would be unlawful discrimination if practiced in settings of public accommodation or employment.
Title 42 1985
Among the courts that have attempted to formulate working
criteria, three general approaches emerged in the period between Grif-
fin and Scott: (1) "clearly defined groups";27 (2) "immutable charac-
teristics" /"historically pervasive discrimination";28 and (3) "equal
protection" /"political association analysis."29 Of these three, only the "immutable characteristics" and "equal protection" approaches ap-
pear to have survived Scott.
Clearly identified groups have been made, and one group gets to enjoy rights, privileges, and immunity not secured by the other group.
This is how they have destroyed reality with diversity, inclusion and equity.
They wrote the laws, we simply need to use them.
Discriminatory hiring practices that use unreasonable demands are in violation of the 14th ammendment.
Almost every medical facility accepts medicaid, and if they do, they are usually liable.
Title 42 1985
Among the courts that have attempted to formulate working
criteria, three general approaches emerged in the period between Grif-
fin and Scott: (1) "clearly defined groups";27 (2) "immutable charac-
teristics" /"historically pervasive discrimination";28 and (3) "equal
protection" /"political association analysis."29 Of these three, only the "immutable characteristics" and "equal protection" approaches ap-
pear to have survived Scott.
Clearly identified groups have been made, and one group gets to enjoy rights, privileges, and immunity not secured by the other group.
This is how they have destroyed reality with diversity, inclusion and equity.
They wrote the laws, we simply need to use them.
Discriminatory hiring practices that use unreasonable demands are in violation of the 14th ammendment.
Almost every medical facility accepts medicaid, and if they do, they are usually liable.
Posted on 2/10/23 at 10:01 am to BamaScoop
Ask your atty about the following:
-tortious interference with contract
-unfair trade practice
-invasion of privacy
Godspeed. A lot will depend on your home state laws.
Us lawyers are not all terrible. Some of us are still fighting the good fight.
ETA - my only advice is to DEFINITELY hire a lawyer. Find one who specializes in either employment law (plaintiff) or civil rights litigation. Educate yourself on the types of claims, but please don’t try to pro-se. That sounds romantic, but there’s a reason we go to law school.
-tortious interference with contract
-unfair trade practice
-invasion of privacy
Godspeed. A lot will depend on your home state laws.
Us lawyers are not all terrible. Some of us are still fighting the good fight.
ETA - my only advice is to DEFINITELY hire a lawyer. Find one who specializes in either employment law (plaintiff) or civil rights litigation. Educate yourself on the types of claims, but please don’t try to pro-se. That sounds romantic, but there’s a reason we go to law school.
This post was edited on 2/10/23 at 10:05 am
Posted on 2/10/23 at 10:36 am to Wednesday
In my experience through the courts, I have yet to meet one lawyer that respects the rules of evidence or the rules of procedure.
Now I am not an absolutist or do i think all lawyers are bad but rather I'm a realist and the education for lawyers today is just as horrible as other institutions and the moral decay of society hasn't missed the profession of attorneys.
Government and medical institutions employ by contract a huge percentage of attorneys and lawfirms.
Why? Because it is profitable...
Continuing education for the auto didactic should never be frowned upon.
Just simply ignore all the sovereign citizen garbage about secret trust and birth certificate nonsense.
Knowledge is power and learning how to apply it is wisdom
Now I am not an absolutist or do i think all lawyers are bad but rather I'm a realist and the education for lawyers today is just as horrible as other institutions and the moral decay of society hasn't missed the profession of attorneys.
Government and medical institutions employ by contract a huge percentage of attorneys and lawfirms.
Why? Because it is profitable...
Continuing education for the auto didactic should never be frowned upon.
Just simply ignore all the sovereign citizen garbage about secret trust and birth certificate nonsense.
Knowledge is power and learning how to apply it is wisdom
Back to top


0





