- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Grokipedia will be an alternative to Wikipedia
Posted on 9/30/25 at 11:04 am to MidWestGuy
Posted on 9/30/25 at 11:04 am to MidWestGuy
quote:
but how do you control this? How do you keep bias from creeping in?
GROK only gets what's on the internet and a lot of that is badly polluted with leftist shite.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 12:10 pm to John Barron
Wikipedia also has no comments section or a way to rate their information. Just trust them. Trust the experts. Trust the science. We’re just supposed to be good little gullible boys and girls.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 12:13 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
People can google or search for encyclopedia articles or plain old news articles. Or even just click the source links in Wikipedia articles.
Or create alternatives. You didn't mention that.
Clicking the source links for Wiki is only so good if certain sources are banned because of ideological bias.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 12:15 pm to TigerAxeOK
I mean, Cubbies, any thoughts on that framing?
Posted on 9/30/25 at 12:17 pm to Tigertittie
Wikipedia had Charlie Kirks death up so quickly with a bunch of wrongful smears. I wonder if they did this days before as others did?
Popular
Back to top

0






