Started By
Message

re: Grokipedia will be an alternative to Wikipedia

Posted on 9/30/25 at 11:04 am to
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
24903 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 11:04 am to
quote:

but how do you control this? How do you keep bias from creeping in?



GROK only gets what's on the internet and a lot of that is badly polluted with leftist shite.
Posted by tigerlion
Member since Jul 2009
2020 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 12:10 pm to
Wikipedia also has no comments section or a way to rate their information. Just trust them. Trust the experts. Trust the science. We’re just supposed to be good little gullible boys and girls.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
85768 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

People can google or search for encyclopedia articles or plain old news articles. Or even just click the source links in Wikipedia articles.



Or create alternatives. You didn't mention that.

Clicking the source links for Wiki is only so good if certain sources are banned because of ideological bias.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
85768 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 12:15 pm to
I mean, Cubbies, any thoughts on that framing?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
161883 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 12:17 pm to
Wikipedia had Charlie Kirks death up so quickly with a bunch of wrongful smears. I wonder if they did this days before as others did?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram