- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ginsburg: Abortion safer than childbirth
Posted on 3/9/20 at 11:49 am to Zach
Posted on 3/9/20 at 11:49 am to Zach
quote:
Ginsberg has stated that Roe v. Wade was judicial reach. She believes that abortion rights should come from the legislative branch the way it does in Europe. Not from court activism.
Roe was an awful decision where the ruling was pulled out of thin air. Even pro-abortion people readily admit to that. They are just too enthralled with killing black babies to care.
Posted on 3/9/20 at 11:50 am to BlackAdam
quote:you are arguing but there is more medical rick associated with abortion than is generally believed to be the case. Fine.
BlackAdam
That is still an argument regarding “medical risk,“ and the issue of “medical risk“ remains the most important issue related to justification for this particular legislation and credentialing.
You assert that a greater risk justifies the legislation.
Thank you for confirming my point.
This post was edited on 3/9/20 at 12:03 pm
Posted on 3/9/20 at 12:46 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
You misunderstand the point I made in that post. I will not yet opine as to whether you did so intentionally, because I frankly have no idea who you are. It is entirely possible that you simply do not have a very good understanding of the legal issues related to THIS thread and THIS specific case.
This thread arises from oral arguments in a specific case, related NOT to a law banning abortion (your “murder” argument), but rather a law regarding procedural requirements for facilities which provide abortion services).
Yes, the “murder“ question is a significant part of the OVERALL abortion debate. Personally, I think that terminology is moronic, but the issue is indeed an important part of the debate.
As to THIS case, that is simply not an issue. The state of Louisiana acknowledged that abortion is (at least for now) legal, and the legislature came up with a set of policies and procedures which nonetheless attempted to curtail it.
The legality of that effort is the issue in THIS case. And that issue will be resolved, at least in part, based upon comparative medical risk.
Good Lord man.........just talk like a normal person. In trying to show you are more educated and intelligent, you are actually doing the opposite. We all think you sit around with a Thesaurus, dictionary and Westlaw.
Posted on 3/9/20 at 1:12 pm to Geauxboy
quote:I am genuinely curious as to what words or phrases from the post in question you found to be “pretentious” or whatever other adjective you might choose to use. The only word that I might not have used in an oral discussion is “opine.”
Geauxboy
quote:I write using the same vocabulary, grammar and syntax that I use in verbal communication. I do occasionally use a dictionary to confirm spelling.
We all think you sit around with a Thesaurus, dictionary and Westlaw.
This post was edited on 3/9/20 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 3/9/20 at 1:28 pm to MeatCleaverWeaver
she should be aborted.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News