- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Francis Fukuyama - The End of History
Posted on 8/15/24 at 11:04 pm
Posted on 8/15/24 at 11:04 pm
Fukuyama published a book in 1992 called “The End of History”. Keep in mind, this was shortly after the Cold War ended and the Soviet Union splintered into different nation states. In the book, Fukuyama argues that with this victory, liberal democracy was now gospel and that countries like Russia and China were going to quickly model themselves after the U.S. Fukuyama worked in the State Department, and people in the government actually believed this.
The 21st century has been the utter repudiation of this idea that all peoples will be united under a unipolar “international rules based order”. What politicians didn’t realize and don’t realize now is that nationalism is very real. Under Yeltsin, Russia was utterly emasculated and made to look like a red headed stepchild of the U.S., so they turned to Putin. China introduced some of the free market into their economy, but they are hardly liberal or democratic.
The Russians and the Chinese both want to have their own spheres of influence and regional power in the way we have ours. People identify with a homeland much more than they do abstract ideas like liberal democracy. This is what we should want; we shouldn’t want a unipolar world where one country dominates the others. Given that the natural tendency of any state is to expand, the more competition among states and nationalities, the more of a check there is on those tendencies.
The 21st century has been the utter repudiation of this idea that all peoples will be united under a unipolar “international rules based order”. What politicians didn’t realize and don’t realize now is that nationalism is very real. Under Yeltsin, Russia was utterly emasculated and made to look like a red headed stepchild of the U.S., so they turned to Putin. China introduced some of the free market into their economy, but they are hardly liberal or democratic.
The Russians and the Chinese both want to have their own spheres of influence and regional power in the way we have ours. People identify with a homeland much more than they do abstract ideas like liberal democracy. This is what we should want; we shouldn’t want a unipolar world where one country dominates the others. Given that the natural tendency of any state is to expand, the more competition among states and nationalities, the more of a check there is on those tendencies.
Posted on 8/16/24 at 12:12 am to DyeHardDylan
[quote]The 21st century has been the utter repudiation of this idea that all peoples will be united under a unipolar “international rules based order”[/quote]
Huh? Where are you getting that part from? Been awhile since I read The End of History, but that wasn't my take away.
He said that the debate is over and liberal democracy won. Not that each state would be replaced with a global world government. Rather, each state would be democratic (in their own version, not necessarily like the US).
Huh? Where are you getting that part from? Been awhile since I read The End of History, but that wasn't my take away.
He said that the debate is over and liberal democracy won. Not that each state would be replaced with a global world government. Rather, each state would be democratic (in their own version, not necessarily like the US).
Posted on 8/16/24 at 12:19 am to DyeHardDylan
I'm cool with Russia taking over at this point.
Posted on 8/16/24 at 6:49 am to PuertoRicanBlaze
i rememebr reading Fukuyama in my poly sci classes in the latter 2000s, where it was still treeated as gospel.
things really have seemed to kick off since the Arab Spring
things really have seemed to kick off since the Arab Spring
Popular
Back to top
2






