- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I wouldn't 
2
Posted on 12/15/18 at 11:58 am to JuiceTerry
quote:
They supplied a 302
They did not. They supplied Strzok's follow up interview (conducted by the Mueller team) from 7 months after Flynn's WH interview. FBI protocol is to have a 302 produced up to 5 days after the initial interview is completed
Mueller did not turn that over. Where is it???
Posted on 12/15/18 at 11:59 am to JuiceTerry
quote:"a 302" won't cut it. That's like claiming a man's DNA turned up in a rape kit, but providing DNA obtained from somewhere else under the wink-wink-nod-nod that it's all the same.
They supplied a 302
Posted on 12/15/18 at 1:19 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Not even true, and there is a 302
And I'm sure you don't want to apply that rule to Hillary the Hag
302 provided references an earlier 302. Judge asked for everything and didn't get it. You are ok with our honest bob saying "frick you judge, not giving you the evidence you asked for"? WTF is wrong with you? You ok with people being convicted with only some of the evidence? Then, the 302 they provided shows the agents didn't think he lied or was being dishonest.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News