Started By
Message

re: Federal Court Rules Against FDA Over Anti-Ivermectin Posts

Posted on 9/3/23 at 5:02 pm to
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 9/3/23 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

Oh ok. I’ve changed my mind, then. It’s perfectly appropriate and part of the serious responsibility of public health administration in a time of crisis for the FDA to make fun of a frightened American public by comparing them to livestock.

I agree with you. I think that "are you a horse" line was inappropriate. I still don't see the docs winning this case.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 9/3/23 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

2020_reVISION


I'm sorry that you've been misled. What I stated was fact.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 9/3/23 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

Remember when you claimed that you worked at the CDC?


Never claimed that - I've been very clear at the hospital / university I work at.
Posted by Larry_Hotdogs
Texas
Member since Jun 2019
2071 posts
Posted on 9/3/23 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

None have shown any benefit. I know it's hard for some of you to understand how science in medicine works, but in this (and many things) you are objectively wrong.


Cite them.

And then cite all the studies about the “safe and effective” vaccines.

“Some of you” think you understand how science works, and you insist on standing on some contrived high ground, but you refuse to acknowledge the empirical evidence that indicates you are wrong.

Shill.
Posted by LSUA 75
Colfax,La.
Member since Jan 2019
4936 posts
Posted on 9/3/23 at 8:43 pm to
I think a pretty good indication that ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were effective against Covid was the unrelenting vicious attacks against them and any Drs.that advocated their use.

If the “authorities “ were so sure they weren’t effective they wouldn’t have gone to near the degree they did to try and stop their use.Then the advocates for ivermectin and hcq would have looked like quacks and snake oil salesman if in fact they didn’t work.

It was just a big smear campaign to enrich themselves by pushing the shite vaccines,remdesiver,Paxlovid and molnuprivar.

Ivermectin works,google :Dr. Joseph Varon
Dr. Mary Talley Bowden
Dr.Harvey Risch
Sister Deidre Byrne
Dr.Pierre Kory-read his book THE WAR AGAINST
IVERMECTIN.
Interestingly,he admits to being a staunch Democrat,disciple of The New York Times and voted for Biden.He came to realize the collossal mistake he made,he now realizes the Democrat party is evil to it’s core.
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 9/4/23 at 6:50 am to
quote:

I think a pretty good indication that ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were effective against Covid was the unrelenting vicious attacks against them and any Drs.that advocated their use.

Who could argue with rajin' Cajun logic?
Posted by 2020_reVISION
Richmond,VA
Member since Dec 2020
3289 posts
Posted on 9/4/23 at 7:56 am to
quote:

Quick Google search shows:

FDA 'recommends' against Meridia

FDA 'recommends' against prolonged use of Magnesium Sulfate to stop pre-term labor due to bone changes in exposed nabies

FDA 'recommends' against the continued use of propoxyphene

FDA 'recommends' against codeine and tramadol usage in adolescents between 12 and 18 years of age who are obese.

And so on and so on.



Meridia
"clinical trial data indicating an increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events, including heart attack and stroke"

Real world data says the same about the jab.


Magnesium Sulfate
"A new Labor and Delivery section emphasizing that continuous administration of magnesium sulfate injection to treat pre-term labor is not approved and that the safety and efficacy of use for this indication are not established."

Hmmm...just like the jab for pregnant women.
Kind of phobic & bigoted, as they make no mention of pregnant men or birther persons.


Propoxyphene

"new data indicate this drug may cause serious toxicity to the heart, even when used at therapeutic doses."

Wow, seems we have a trend developing here.


Codeine and Tramado

"the risks of these medicines outweigh the benefits in children younger than 18."

Now we've established a pattern.
At least the FDA actually listened to the advisory committee on this one, unlike they did for the jab.


Conclusion: The FDA should have pulled the investigational, synthetic modified RNA "vaccine" from the market considering it's risks, it's lack of effectiveness & safety testing data instead of focusing on a drug with a proven safety record & no definitive reason whatsoever to discourage it's use.

And so on and so on...







first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram