- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fed Prosecutors allegedly informed DJT that he is Criminal Target, likely to be indicted
Posted on 6/7/23 at 3:12 pm to PsychTiger
Posted on 6/7/23 at 3:12 pm to PsychTiger
quote:
he next 17 months will be something to behold.
The only thing will make it tolerable is LSU winning national titles in baseball and football.
a big ask.
how about playing wake for baseball natty and beating bama in the football reg.
and throw in a win over the big ten winner in the semis.
0
Posted on 6/7/23 at 3:14 pm to RCDfan1950
quote:
So did Jesus.
Jesus said he is one with the divine.
Posted on 6/7/23 at 3:20 pm to Pezzo
quote:
anything to get him off the ticket. they're scared shitless
This is the Daniel Oretega method of staying in power. Anyone who runs against the communists gets arrested. Arresting opponents is what communists do to their opposition.
Posted on 6/7/23 at 3:24 pm to VoxDawg
Unrolled version of full thread for those who don't Twit
The nerve to continue the it's happening when Durham was a dud is astounding. Did he also push devolution? Another crock of crap...
Seriously...why give out hopium jugs? For the paypal clicks?
quote:This guy said the same thing before. The bad guys will get arrested. Blowing smoke up people's asses for how many years now?
Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit
@drawandstrike
The nerve to continue the it's happening when Durham was a dud is astounding. Did he also push devolution? Another crock of crap...
Seriously...why give out hopium jugs? For the paypal clicks?
Posted on 6/7/23 at 4:31 pm to KAGTASTIC
quote:
So all of this over documents a President has seen and took like other presidents have done?
No, it’s his refusal to give them back when subpoenaed. It’s having your attorney sign something saying there are no more documents when you know there are. That’s the issue. They weren’t his to have, and the US government demanded them back by subpoena, and he refused to comply. He doubled down by lying about it. That’s the issue.
Posted on 6/7/23 at 4:38 pm to cajunangelle
Mike Davis just told Bannon they will indict Trump, convict him and then Trump will take it to SCOTUS.
He said Garland will ignore the Presidential Records Act.
He said Garland will ignore the Presidential Records Act.
Posted on 6/7/23 at 4:40 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
No, it’s his refusal to give them back when subpoenaed. It’s having your attorney sign something saying there are no more documents when you know there are. That’s the issue. They weren’t his to have, and the US government demanded them back by subpoena, and he refused to comply. He doubled down by lying about it. That’s the issue.
None of that matters. His powers as president to declassify are plenary.
Posted on 6/7/23 at 5:46 pm to loogaroo
quote:
None of that matters. His powers as president to declassify are plenary.
Then he has to prove he declassified them, not everything is going to be under Crossfire. For the other things, where is the proof be declassified them?
Posted on 6/7/23 at 5:48 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
Then he has to prove he declassified them, not everything is going to be under Crossfire. For the other things, where is the proof be declassified them?
He does not have to prove anything. He was the president. Presidential powers to declassify are plenary.
What don't you understand about that?
Posted on 6/7/23 at 5:51 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
No, it’s his refusal to give them back when subpoenaed. It’s having your attorney sign something saying there are no more documents when you know there are. That’s the issue. They weren’t his to have, and the US government demanded them back by subpoena, and he refused to comply. He doubled down by lying about it. That’s the issue.
So Biden did that 5x over, for shite he got when he wasn't president, where's his issue?
Posted on 6/7/23 at 6:10 pm to loogaroo
quote:
He does not have to prove anything. He was the president. Presidential powers to declassify are plenary. What don't you understand about that?
What do you think plenary means? He still has to do it. You do realize he doesn’t have the right to declassify anymore, right? If he didn’t declassify before, then it wasn’t done. He established he knew there was a process when he did the crossfire declassification. It’s going to be hard to claim on these other documents he told no one about it and just did it. Do you not see that’s a problem?
Posted on 6/7/23 at 6:11 pm to rhar61
quote:
So Biden did that 5x over, for shite he got when he wasn't president, where's his issue?
Can you find where Biden ignored a subpoena for the documents or had his attorney claim falsely they had given everything back? There should be lots of examples if he did it five times more as you say.
Posted on 6/7/23 at 6:21 pm to Fun Bunch
I hate all this foreplay..can we just race ahead to the frick scene..
Where all the complicit Dems & RINOs are before UCMJ..
Some of us were Ritalin kids.
Where all the complicit Dems & RINOs are before UCMJ..
Some of us were Ritalin kids.
Posted on 6/7/23 at 6:25 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
Then he has to prove he declassified them,
I asked this before....where is the legal SOP process for the President when he leaves offices regarding documents? The same exact one that all Presidents before him followed.
Ie...what legal statute says he has to show proof?
Posted on 6/7/23 at 6:31 pm to KAGTASTIC
quote:
I asked this before....where is the legal SOP process for the President when he leaves offices regarding documents? The same exact one that all Presidents before him followed. Ie...what legal statute says he has to show proof?
No other president has ignored a subpoena and had his attorney lie about it. That’s the difference. The only thing he can do is say they were declassified. He will have to show his work. No other president has needed to because no other one has put himself in the same position.
Posted on 6/7/23 at 6:31 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
Can you find where Biden ignored a subpoena for the documents or had his attorney claim falsely they had given everything back? There should be lots of examples if he did it five times more as you say.
Biden was VP when he took the documents, not president so he should have never walked out with the docs in the first place to be subpoena'd. He created a crime the moment he walked off the premises with it. From what know Trumped followed the same rules as every president did prior to him...unless there is something we don't know.
Posted on 6/7/23 at 6:34 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
No other president has ignored a subpoena and had his attorney lie about it. That’s the difference. The only thing he can do is say they were declassified. He will have to show his work. No other president has needed to because no other one has put himself in the same position.
And you failed to provide what matters. Let's start with...what law was that subpoena based on that requires him to do what you are saying?
The "Trump didn't do something another Prez has done" isn't an excuse because on the flip side...."no other Prez has been gone after like Trump has"
Posted on 6/7/23 at 6:35 pm to KAGTASTIC
quote:
Biden was VP when he took the documents, not president so he should have never walked out with the docs in the first place to be subpoena'd. He created a crime the moment he walked off the premises with it. From what know Trumped followed the same rules as every president did prior to him...unless there is something we don't know.
Biden returned them when found and willingly brought them to the Archives attention. Trump refused to turn them over and denied having them. No other president has done that. It’s a lie to say Trump has done what every other president has. It’s not the fact he took them. It’s that he refused to give them back. That’s the real issue.
Posted on 6/7/23 at 6:38 pm to CelticDog
quote:
indeed! Whataboutism! tell us all about it. my mom taught me at age 11 that whataboutism doesn't cut it. I was like, "but they did it." whataboutism does not hold up in court any better than in homes around the nation.
Whataboutism, huh?
Trump was president you dumb shite. Biden had these documents whenever he was Vice President, in a house his corrupt arse son was renting in the garage. There’s really no comparison you dumb piece of shite.
Posted on 6/7/23 at 6:38 pm to KAGTASTIC
quote:
And you failed to provide what matters. Let's start with...what law was that subpoena based on that requires him to do what you are saying? The "Trump didn't do something another Prez has done" isn't an excuse because on the flip side...."no other Prez has been gone after like Trump has"
What right does he have to have classified documents after he is no longer president and the government requests them back?
Page 3 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News