- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/14/20 at 12:19 pm to mark65mc
By your logic, when Trump retweets someone with Q in their twitter profile/hashtag it means nothing? When that has been posted on twitter as definite Q proofs.
The Flynn family were/are supposedly split on QAnon. Joseph supposedly is full Q and the others roll their eyes at him?
Gen Flynn's denial he was endorsing Q said that they appreciate the support but do not endorse.
Why would they give Q accolades and then throw shade? A secret high five? Or an accident as Flynn has refereced the JFK bell before?
The Flynn family were/are supposedly split on QAnon. Joseph supposedly is full Q and the others roll their eyes at him?
Gen Flynn's denial he was endorsing Q said that they appreciate the support but do not endorse. Why would they give Q accolades and then throw shade? A secret high five? Or an accident as Flynn has refereced the JFK bell before?
This post was edited on 7/14/20 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 7/14/20 at 12:22 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
why would they post on an image board of loons on a Russian server?
That Russian server angle has been oft-repeated, but there is additional information to consider, too. Some of the pings go through DOD hardware.
Thread detailing IP routes.
Posted on 7/14/20 at 12:24 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Gen Flynn's denial he was endorsing Q said that they appreciate the support but do not endorse.
Is there a massive White Squall fandom out there? Some kind of SquallCon that folks can go to?
That's the only other place you're going to find folks saying "Where we go one, we go all."
Posted on 7/14/20 at 12:38 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
By your logic, when Trump retweets someone with Q in their twitter profile/hashtag it means nothing? When that has been posted on twitter as definite Q proofs.
I don't take that as a Q proof. I do see it as a sign of growth of Q followers aligning with MAGA supporters. Trump at his rallies making Q signs in the air, pointing out babies with Q on their onesies, our pointing out people with Q signs, yeah, that's a little bit different. We do not even know who is taking care of the Presidential twitter.
How about this video of the Flynn family and friends on the 4th of July reciting the oath to defend the Constitution? Q suggested the oath. I would say that would count as them being believers in Q. LINK
Proofs to me are when Q calls shots and then things happen. One of the first was the Lord's Prayer. I do not subscribe to a clock theory or dates. I understand that we are in a war and there is an opposition fighting back. To be able to give specific dates is to guarantee failure to hit those dates.
Posted on 7/14/20 at 1:48 pm to GumboPot
quote:
But that has never happened. He's an impostor until then.
How come that same burden of proof isn't required from Q? And before the plausible deniability/nat sec argument is thrown out there, you could use the same argument as to why this Austin fellow hasn't.
Posted on 7/14/20 at 1:51 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Know who else gets called nuts and treated accordingly?
Dangit, I thought you were going to say "People who believe Q is a Military Operation"
Posted on 7/14/20 at 1:54 pm to whocares1
quote:
How come that same burden of proof isn't required from Q?
Know how I know that you don't understand how the 8chan/8kun tripcode system works?
Posted on 7/14/20 at 1:55 pm to mark65mc
quote:
Proofs to me are when Q calls shots and then things happen.
The only thing that has happened is this country has been turned to sh1t. If there were actually some good people in power none of this would have been allowed to happen
Posted on 7/14/20 at 1:55 pm to whocares1
quote:
How come that same burden of proof isn't required from Q? And before the plausible deniability/nat sec argument is thrown out there, you could use the same argument as to why this Austin fellow hasn't.
Spoiler: they have Q proofs.
Posted on 7/14/20 at 2:00 pm to whocares1
quote:
How come that same burden of proof isn't required from Q?
If some rando from Dearborn, MI claimed to be Q, the same questions would be asked of him. Q has proven through unique photos from AF1/over NK, etc. to be inside Trump's inner circle.
If Dan Scavino comes out and says he is a member of the Q team, that would line up with some of those Q drops. That would help prove some theories about the Q team.
Posted on 7/14/20 at 2:00 pm to cajunangelle
Steinbart is a clown ... a fraud ... period.
Posted on 7/14/20 at 2:10 pm to mark65mc
why do people presume the 8kun Q is from the Trump team?
Posted on 7/14/20 at 2:15 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Know how I know that you don't understand how the 8chan/8kun tripcode system works?
I do. You could have just answered the question.
Know how I know that you don't understand how "pings" work?
Posted on 7/14/20 at 2:22 pm to cajunangelle
The more pressing question for me is how could you still support "the plan" even if it were a plan? How could you support not locking pedophiles and human traffickers if "we have it all"? The argument of "we have to wait until judges are in place" or "the deep state has to be uprooted first" is stale. Or the best "sometimes people have to see for themselves". If you have evidence of human abuse, drop that stack. If heads don't roll, appropriate follow up action would be taken.
Posted on 7/14/20 at 2:30 pm to whocares1
Makes sense and is very logical. Q says to think logically.
So I take it you aren't Austin?
I sent him the link to this thread.
So I take it you aren't Austin?
I sent him the link to this thread.
Posted on 7/14/20 at 2:31 pm to mark65mc
Thank you, that response was much more articulate and thought out than "know how I know"
Posted on 7/14/20 at 2:35 pm to cajunangelle
I'm not Austin. But I do think that Voxdawg is Trayce Beanz and Joe M's son coming back from the future. He has come back to ensure that they keep inflating his inheritance.
Posted on 7/14/20 at 2:41 pm to whocares1
quote:
Thank you, that response was much more articulate and thought out than "know how I know"
Sorry, but your question was retarded.
Premise: "If Austin is Q, why can't he post with Q's tripcode?"
whocares1: "Why doesn't Q have to meet that same burden of proof?"
Logic: "Why does Q, who posts with Q's unique tripcode and does so every time he posts to 8k do the thing we just established he does?"
Posted on 7/14/20 at 2:47 pm to VoxDawg
I thought the Q drops were deltaed because they went through a quantum leap. so how can Austin re do what is done if he wrote them in the future already.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News