- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
DOJ And Trump Ask Supreme Court To Review $83.3 Million Carroll Verdict
Posted on 7/29/26 at 10:17 am
Posted on 7/29/26 at 10:17 am
LINK
quote:
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) asked the U.S. Supreme Court on July 28 to intervene in the defamation dispute between President Donald Trump and writer E. Jean Carroll.
quote:
The DOJ is arguing in the petition in United States v. Carroll that the federal government - not Trump personally - should be the defendant in the case that led to an $83.3 million verdict against Trump.
At the same time, Trump’s private attorneys filed a petition with the high court in the case of Trump v. Carroll, asking the justices to review the same verdict, largely on grounds of presidential immunity.
The DOJ’s petition, a copy of which was obtained by The Epoch Times, focuses on the federal Westfall Act, which shields federal employees from personal liability for common law tort lawsuits arising from their government employment.
quote:
The $83.3 million verdict arose from statements Trump made in mid-2019 while he was president, in which he denied Carroll’s allegation that he sexually assaulted her in the mid-1990s. Trump denied the claim in an official White House statement and again when speaking to reporters—statements the jury found defamatory.
In 2020, then-Attorney General William Barr, who served in Trump’s Cabinet, certified under the Westfall Act that Trump’s statements were within the scope of his official duties. As a result, the case, which had been pending in New York state court, was transferred to federal court. Then in 2023, then-Attorney General Merrick Garland, who served in President Joe Biden’s Cabinet, took the unusual step of withdrawing the certification, the petition said.
This allowed the lawsuit to move forward against Trump personally, after which the jury found for Carroll, rendering the $83.3 million verdict.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 10:34 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Merrick garland a DB extremeous…….
Still mad he did not make the SCOTUS…….
Still mad he did not make the SCOTUS…….
Posted on 7/29/26 at 10:36 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
The defamation suit should be unanimously slapped down. You have an absolute right do deny an accusation. Otherwise we have a precedent that can undermine the right to a fair trial.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 10:38 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
It is crazy that a person could be found guilty of "sexual assault" of someone they never even met.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 10:53 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Got nothing to do with DOJ or the United States. This is a waste of tax money.
Posted on 7/29/26 at 10:58 am to Zgeo
quote:
Merrick garland a DB extremeous…….
hate that fricker almost as much as Mayorkas
Popular
Back to top

4






