- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Cue Darth Maul music: Supreme Court finna eat.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:09 pm
This is where we take our country back. There is no Left as we know it today without the censorship of silicon valley. This is the battlefield of the 2nd Civil War and Burt Kavenbaw is about to do a kegger at Tobin’s all over the faces of the dirty SJW censoring traitors of this country.
Supreme Court agrees to hear a case that could determine whether Facebook, Twitter and other social media companies can censor their users
quote:
The case, Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, No. 17-702, centers on whether a private operator of a public access television network is considered a state actor, which can be sued for First Amendment violations.
The case could have broader implications for social media and other media outlets. In particular, a broad ruling from the high court could open the country's largest technology companies up to First Amendment lawsuits.
Supreme Court agrees to hear a case that could determine whether Facebook, Twitter and other social media companies can censor their users
This post was edited on 10/17/18 at 1:18 pm
5
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:33 pm to Stacked
Umm... Brett, not Burt.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:37 pm to Stacked
Government controlling private companies creates a slippery slope. I hate how twitter censors the right, but I don't want the government involved in their business
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:38 pm to JawjaTigah
Burt is party Brett, Baw.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:39 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Government controlling private companies creates a slippery slope
this
I do not want the government controlling private company behavior no matter how much I hate that behavior. This is a door I'd much rather not crack open for them.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:39 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Government controlling private companies creates a slippery slope. I hate how twitter censors the right, but I don't want the government involved in their business
I agree with you, however I love the irony of the government forcing left leaning organizations to be free.
They want the government to tell you what to do, BOOM Bitches!!!
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:40 pm to Stacked
quote:Then who the frick is Bart?
Burt is party Brett, Baw.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:40 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Government controlling private companies
I don’t think assuring that freedom of speech still means something equals “controlling” the private company. There are far more regulations placed on those same companies by that same government and you don’t consider they control those private companies now.
This post was edited on 10/17/18 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:41 pm to DarthRebel
The irony isn't lost on me. I just don't like the precedent it sets. This is like Harry Reid going nuclear only to have it boomerang 5 years later
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:42 pm to Jbird
quote:
Then who the frick is Bart
Bart is Dark Burt.
Brett basketball coaches
Burt boozes
Bart boofs
This post was edited on 10/17/18 at 4:46 pm
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:42 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Government controlling private companies creates a slippery slope. I hate how twitter censors the right, but I don't want the government involved in their business
^ this is the ony correct answer. Let the loonie left be the party that demands that the government step in and squash the rights of others.
I don't believe the government has the right to tell a private business who they must serve, whether they are are discriminating by race, by gender, by native language, or by political persuasion. It's THEIR business, they have the right, not the customer.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:42 pm to Stacked
quote:
I don’t think assuring that freedom of speech equals “controlling” the private company.
Dictating their company policies through force is the issue, not 1A
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:43 pm to Stacked
quote:
This is the battlefield of the 2nd Civil War and Burt Kavenbaw is about to do a kegger at Tobin’s all over the faces of the dirty SJW censoring traitors of this country.
You're a crazy sumbitch.
Gotta love "conservatives" wanting more regulations.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:44 pm to BayouBlitz
Yeah, it's dumb.
Calling them out on their biased treatment is more effective and doesn't allow them to play the victim card while also not getting the govt involved
Calling them out on their biased treatment is more effective and doesn't allow them to play the victim card while also not getting the govt involved
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:45 pm to Stacked
quote:
I don’t think assuring that freedom of speech equals “controlling” the private company.
You are not owed freedom of speech by a private entity. The Freedom of Speech only limits government action. By forcing a private company to give someone a platform to speak, the government is controlling the company.
Also, the article in the OP is making a pretty significant leap from the merits of that case and the government's ability to censor social media giants.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:46 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Calling them out on their biased treatment is more effective and doesn't allow them to play the victim card while also not getting the govt involved
If they could they’d train them all like you.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:47 pm to Stacked
This world would be a lot more awesome if they would
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:51 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
This world would be a lot more awesome if they would
Nah I think it’s best for the world when good guys are fighters.
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:53 pm to JawjaTigah
Bart Kavenbrew
Posted on 10/17/18 at 1:55 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
By forcing a private company to give someone a platform to speak, the government is controlling the company.
Obviously you extend this same feeling toward the government for having control over every restaurant in our country by forcing them to not turn away blacks.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News