Started By
Message

re: Christian group lambasts Virginia restaurant for 'stunning' service denial

Posted on 12/8/22 at 7:42 pm to
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28137 posts
Posted on 12/8/22 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

Any two situations will have some distinction.


"I won't serve you at all"

and

"I don't make that type of product. But you're welcome to buy the products I do make."

Are more different than similar, though. It's not even close...
This post was edited on 12/8/22 at 7:43 pm
Posted by Numberwang
Bike City, USA
Member since Feb 2012
13163 posts
Posted on 12/8/22 at 7:55 pm to
So I can discriminate against any group of people by simply claiming their presence makes me "feel unsafe"?

Good to know.
Posted by Numberwang
Bike City, USA
Member since Feb 2012
13163 posts
Posted on 12/8/22 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

Why can’t people simply go eat somewhere else?


You can only have one of the two:

1. Freedom of association

2. The Civil Rights Act.

Pick one.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 12/8/22 at 7:58 pm to
Sue them out of business.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 12/9/22 at 8:00 am to
quote:

That makes absolutely zero sense. Being forced to leave an establishment is a Christian value?


Masterpiece Cake Shop certainly turned it into one.
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 12/9/22 at 8:01 am to
Shut up, groomer.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299521 posts
Posted on 12/9/22 at 8:02 am to
quote:

So I can discriminate against any group of people by simply claiming their presence makes me "feel unsafe"?


I'll use that excuse from now on when people wonder why I don't frequent certain hoods or businesses.

"Its not because they're black or gay, its because I dont feel safe."

These women would certainly understand that.
This post was edited on 12/9/22 at 8:03 am
Posted by Kingshakabooboo
Member since Nov 2012
1901 posts
Posted on 12/9/22 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Either people can serve who they wish or they have to serve everyone. Pick a side.


Christians did pick a side. We said that businesses should be able to serve who they want, including the one in this story.

But here is the problem. Our side lost in court. The court said you can’t do what this business is doing. That is what has us pissed. So how about you leftist pick a side. You win the battle in court. Now live by the standard you created.
Posted by VolcanicTiger
Member since Apr 2022
5933 posts
Posted on 12/9/22 at 8:26 am to
quote:

I guess everyone here thinks the Christian baker should be forced to serve the gay people too or the web designer forced to offer services to gay people.

Either people can serve who they wish or they have to serve everyone. Pick a side.

Not the same:
1. They agreed to host it and canceled 90 minutes before
2. The Christian group didn't select their restaurant based on their pro-infanticide/pro-deviance stances - in fact I'd assume they'd go to a place that supported their beliefs (as we all should), given full knowledge of who believes what
3. Wokeism is the new golden calf religion of the Left and it's time to start beating our plowshares into swords
Posted by TigerCoon
Member since Nov 2005
22475 posts
Posted on 12/9/22 at 8:28 am to
Does that include hospitals? Not trying to be a simp here-- just drawing out the rules.
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 12/9/22 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Wokeism is the new golden calf religion of the Left and it's time to start beating our plowshares into swords


I want that on a T-shirt.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram