Started By
Message

re: Axios: Nikki Haley being considered for VP

Posted on 5/13/24 at 6:09 am to
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
5687 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 6:09 am to
quote:

Then why are we doubling down on it?

The same two idiots who put us here, were chosen as our champions once again.


And he's voting for one of them.

Oh, unless he picks a certain VP. Then he's voting for a Democrat.

Their whole narrative is built around trying to have it both ways, though.

You belong with the Democrats even though he's the one vowing to vote for one.

Trump is going to win in a landslide, except that the "Deep State" won't let him win. But he's still the only candidate that they will vote for (the one guaranteed to not win).

The country is circling the drain because it's financially insolvent, but Trump is just as responsible as anyone else and more responsible than most for that state of affairs, yet we will only vote for Trump.

Trump obviously enabled The Swamp the first time around, but we will only vote for Trump.

If they didn't have self-contradictory arguments they'd have no arguments at all.
This post was edited on 5/13/24 at 6:21 am
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
5687 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 6:16 am to
quote:

They bitch about the establishment, and keep voting for the establishment.


Here's what they are far too dumb to understand: There's no such thing as voting for anyone for POTUS who is NOT going to end up being part of "The Establishment."

They are so stupid they believe anything anybody says as long as it is based around "muh Establishment."

It never occurs to them that it is literally impossible to function at the federal level without being a part of "The Establishment." At least to some significant degree.

So they deny the obvious truth that Donald Trump functioned as "The Establishment" the first time around and is giving every indication that he's even more willing to embrace it this time.

Trump did all of two things that probably wouldn't have been done by any other Republican the first time around, and one of them was only to serve his own ego (Jan 6) and shouldn't have happened. The other was pushing against illegal immigration as hard as he did.

Unless you count his far left trade policies, but that's because they are a far left policy, not because no other Republican would have had the guts to do it.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram