Started By
Message

re: Appeals Court Rejects Request to Immediately Restore Travel Ban

Posted on 2/5/17 at 10:31 am to
Posted by guy4lsu
shreveport
Member since Aug 2004
3132 posts
Posted on 2/5/17 at 10:31 am to
Just make the vetting harder. Problem Solved.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135588 posts
Posted on 2/5/17 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

For about the 20th time, that statute has been amended and restricted in multiple occasions
I DGAS whether it has been amended annually, IT IS THE LAW!
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112564 posts
Posted on 2/5/17 at 4:46 pm to
Section (f) stands alone. All the amendments referenced occurred BEFORE Carter's and Obama's actions.

Those were not challenged because they were legal.

Just like this one.
Posted by TGFN57
Telluride
Member since Jan 2010
6975 posts
Posted on 2/6/17 at 7:16 am to
Unconsidered or additional are not the same as alternative.
Alternative facts are lies. No amount of twisting or spinning will change it.
This post was edited on 2/6/17 at 8:16 am
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram