- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/4/26 at 6:13 pm to Ailsa
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Tired_Of_Liars
@Megabogie
9h
Maybe a dead-cat bounce afterwards?
quote:
PatriotJosh
@Patriot_Josh11
12h
A cryptic post by Kirill Dmitriev, a known confidant of Vladimir Putin, showing a black swan crowned with a royal emblem, is more than a casual symbol, it carries serious strategic connotations.
In risk analysis and strategic studies, a “Black Swan” refers to an event that is rare, unpredictable, and massively consequential, a concept formalized in modern decision theory to describe shocks that radically reshape geopolitical or economic systems. Black swan events are characterized by three features: extreme improbability, systemic impact, and retrospective rationalization once the event occurs.
The addition of a crown in this context is particularly intriguing. Symbolically, a crown can denote sovereignty, authority, or a dominant event, suggesting not merely a disruption, but a “king-level” systemic shock capable of reshaping global power structures.
Historically, black swan events have included the collapse of the Soviet Union, the 2008 global financial crisis, the 9/11 attacks, and the COVID-19 pandemic, each transforming the strategic environment overnight.
If Dmitriev’s symbolism is deliberate, potential domains for such a shock could span multiple theaters:
• Economic: sudden sovereign debt collapse, commodity shock, or systemic banking crisis.
• Security: escalation between major powers or a strategic weapons breakthrough.
• Cyber: large-scale infrastructure disruption targeting financial or energy networks.
• Technological: a disruptive AI or quantum breakthrough altering military balance.
• Energy/Logistics: catastrophic disruption to maritime chokepoints or global supply chains.
In strategic signaling culture, especially among geopolitical actors, ambiguous symbolism often precedes narrative shaping. A crowned black swan may therefore be interpreted as a warning, or preparation, for a high-impact systemic event with global consequences

Posted on 3/4/26 at 6:20 pm to Ailsa
Posted on 3/4/26 at 7:04 pm to Ailsa
Dmietriev is always posting Q related material. Kinda strange, eh? He gives outright shout-outs to Q from time to time.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 9:09 am to AlterEd
quote:
Dmietriev is always posting Q related material. Kinda strange, eh? He gives outright shout-outs to Q from time to time.
That's why posts were vague...we weren't the only ones reading them.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 11:37 am to AlterEd
Posted on 3/5/26 at 11:43 am to VoxDawg
It's been deleted..What was it? Did the poster delete it to update and repost?
Posted on 3/5/26 at 12:09 pm to Ailsa
It was the White House official account with a compilation of SecWar Hegseth, our planes bombing the shite out of Iran, and ending with Trump's comments on camera a few months ago of "I was the hunted, now I'm the hunter"
Posted on 3/5/26 at 12:10 pm to VoxDawg
Posted on 3/5/26 at 12:21 pm to VoxDawg
Posted on 3/5/26 at 1:18 pm to VoxDawg
Posted on 3/5/26 at 3:35 pm to VoxDawg
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
Straight trade shift after regime change.
How would "Grok" know?
This post was edited on 3/5/26 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 3/5/26 at 3:58 pm to AlterEd
The news sources grok listed have posted a LOT of fake news...it might be true but we should continue to remember this is a digital war. There's no date on the Treasury/OECD report. Grok and all AI is programmed by whom?
Posted on 3/5/26 at 4:00 pm to Ailsa
Right. I'm not claiming Grok is correct or anything, but I was also curious how it came to that conclusion. But then again, it also cites reports from the Treasury Department.
This post was edited on 3/5/26 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 3/5/26 at 4:19 pm to AlterEd
quote:
it also cites reports from the Treasury Department.
It would be nice to know under whose administration it was reported.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 5:50 am to VoxDawg
Posted on 3/6/26 at 5:20 pm to VoxDawg
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
There is a reflection of the swan.
“Think mirror”.
The next black swan event won’t break the average citizen.
Methinks the next black swan event will cripple [them] and break [their] financial system.
The fact the swan is wearing a crown isn’t lost on me, either. Especially seeing as how the banks in London are getting absolutely hammered due to the Iran situation.
Trump is playing chess while everyone else is playing Connect Four.
Popular
Back to top



1





