- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Gov't denying news access to public records
Posted on 6/18/10 at 11:27 am
Posted on 6/18/10 at 11:27 am
MOBILE, Ala. -- A month ago, as BP struggled to contain an oil spill that it estimated at 200,000 gallons a day, the Press-Register reported that the company's federal permit documents stated that it could handle a spill of 12.6 million gallons a day.
BP's documents also said that it could skim 17 million gallons of oil a day; thus far it has skimmed just 2 million gallons in seven weeks.
The documents -- BP's Regional Oil Spill Response Plan -- are riddled with inaccurate claims and errors, including an online address for an equipment supplier that instead links to an unrelated Japanese website.
In May, the newspaper asked the Department of Interior and the U.S. Minerals Management Service for the response plans of the five major companies drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, arguing that the public had an immediate need to know whether permits for other deepwater wells had been granted based on similarly flawed claims.
Neither federal agency would supply the plans without a Freedom of Information Act request, which the newspaper then filed.
The act, often identified as FOIA, requires the government to make available a wide range of public documents.
The Press-Register went further to ask for immediate access via an expedited FOIA request.
On June 8, federal officials denied the newspaper's request, stating that the agency did not see "an urgency to inform the public."
The newspaper, meanwhile, shared its original findings regarding BP's Regional Oil Spill Response Plan with two members of the U.S. House of Representatives' Energy and Commerce Committee.
The committee then obtained the spill response plans from the Department of Interior. That committee has since begun hearings on the spill.
Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., has said that the plans for Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Shell Offshore Inc., and ExxonMobil were identical to the BP plan that the Press-Register reviewed. All were produced by same Houston-based company, and all contained similar outdated or incorrect information.
Asked Thursday why the Department of Interior did not view as urgent the public's need to see the various plans, Kendra Barkoff, spokeswoman for Interior Secretary Ken Salazar wrote, "The Presidential Commission and other reviews and investigations that are under way will help get to the bottom of what happened and what must be done to ensure that something like this never happens again.
"We have already begun to implement several immediate safety reforms and are working on others that we will be announcing soon," Barkoff wrote.
LINK
BP's documents also said that it could skim 17 million gallons of oil a day; thus far it has skimmed just 2 million gallons in seven weeks.
The documents -- BP's Regional Oil Spill Response Plan -- are riddled with inaccurate claims and errors, including an online address for an equipment supplier that instead links to an unrelated Japanese website.
In May, the newspaper asked the Department of Interior and the U.S. Minerals Management Service for the response plans of the five major companies drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, arguing that the public had an immediate need to know whether permits for other deepwater wells had been granted based on similarly flawed claims.
Neither federal agency would supply the plans without a Freedom of Information Act request, which the newspaper then filed.
The act, often identified as FOIA, requires the government to make available a wide range of public documents.
The Press-Register went further to ask for immediate access via an expedited FOIA request.
On June 8, federal officials denied the newspaper's request, stating that the agency did not see "an urgency to inform the public."
The newspaper, meanwhile, shared its original findings regarding BP's Regional Oil Spill Response Plan with two members of the U.S. House of Representatives' Energy and Commerce Committee.
The committee then obtained the spill response plans from the Department of Interior. That committee has since begun hearings on the spill.
Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., has said that the plans for Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Shell Offshore Inc., and ExxonMobil were identical to the BP plan that the Press-Register reviewed. All were produced by same Houston-based company, and all contained similar outdated or incorrect information.
Asked Thursday why the Department of Interior did not view as urgent the public's need to see the various plans, Kendra Barkoff, spokeswoman for Interior Secretary Ken Salazar wrote, "The Presidential Commission and other reviews and investigations that are under way will help get to the bottom of what happened and what must be done to ensure that something like this never happens again.
"We have already begun to implement several immediate safety reforms and are working on others that we will be announcing soon," Barkoff wrote.
LINK
Posted on 6/18/10 at 11:35 am to Alahunter
At what point is the general public going to realize that the Federal Government is part of the problem and not the solution?
Posted on 6/18/10 at 11:37 am to TigerFred
quote:
At what point is the general public going to realize that the Federal Government is part of the problem and not the solution?


Posted on 6/18/10 at 11:41 am to TigerFred
They won't. It'd take more than a soundbite worth of time to make them understand, so they never will. Just like the majority won't understand that politicians on both sides are wanting to cover their asses for being so lax in their oversight, like what these reports have in them, that are so inaccurate. The only thing they cared about in these reports, is what came with them in their campaign chests.
Posted on 6/18/10 at 11:59 am to Alahunter
Ye of little faith. All we need to do is give the government a little more of your money and this can all be corrected.




Back to top
