- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/3/10 at 11:12 pm to lsugradman
While it was a TO crew running the show, BP had their company man out there that is ultimatly responsible, also Halliburton designed the cement job (with BP approval) and executed the job. They displaced the cement with sea water which was incapable of holding back the well, it should have been displaced with the drilling mud. Of course, I do not know what tests were run (positive and negative pressure test on the plug) and what discussions had taken place after the test were run, if they were. All of this information will come out.
Also, from what I have been able to gather, the rig was changing out mud systems. As a result some of the safety equipment was removed from the mud tanks. Otherwise the crew may have been alerted that they were getting a kick. There were multiple failures that occured for this to happen, and it is impossible to pinpoint one or two events that could have prevented the blowout.
Also, from what I have been able to gather, the rig was changing out mud systems. As a result some of the safety equipment was removed from the mud tanks. Otherwise the crew may have been alerted that they were getting a kick. There were multiple failures that occured for this to happen, and it is impossible to pinpoint one or two events that could have prevented the blowout.
This post was edited on 5/3/10 at 11:13 pm
Posted on 5/3/10 at 11:23 pm to lsugradman
quote:
Transocean employees should have been monitoring this as well.
Exactly which is why I said TransOcean and Halliburton.
Posted on 5/3/10 at 11:25 pm to TigerV
quote:
They displaced the cement with sea water which was incapable of holding back the well, it should have been displaced with the drilling mud.
It's standard procedure to displaced the mud. You can't complete a well with mud. Had the cement job held it would not have mattered.
Posted on 5/4/10 at 7:16 am to redstick13
quote:
It's standard procedure to displaced the mud
It is only standard procedure if negative pressure test comes back OK. Like I said, I do not know what tests were run or the outcome; however, my company's standard procedure is to run positive and negative test on the plug, and we have displaced the cement with drilling mud in cases where we saw pressure increase on the negative test.
Your right you cannot complete a well with mud; however, this well was a long way from being completed.
Popular
Back to top

2





