re: Young Girl and Little Brother attacked

That's why African Americans(is that what you want to be called) will never lose the racist mindset because they always think that white people's actions are caused by a racist angle when in reality it's facts speaking for them instead. Africans don't like the truth they like the controversy of being a so called minority.

CP3 posted this on pg 19 of this thread:

quote:

---

They don’t understand that white people aren’t out to get black people; they are just exhausted with them. They are exhausted by the social pathologies, the violence, the endless complaints, the blind racial solidarity, the bottomless pit of grievances, the excuses, and the reflexive animosity.

---

He hit the nail on the head.

I'm already there.

They not interested in thus thread

quote:

---

No one knows. People are venting because of a perceived racial angle.

---

bullshite ... I don't give 2 fricks if the "person" who savagely attacked that little boy is male, female, black, white, green, or pink with purple polka dots; as I said before, had he been my child, that "person" would not have made it long enough to get arrested, regardless of the perpetrator's race, gender, religion, sexual preference, etc., etc., etc. Nor do I care what the motive or "angle" was for the savagery, although it is ridiculously evident. THAT is what some people are not comprehending. When an adult viciously attacks an innocent party, particularly a child, most people who aren't worthless pieces of shite want justice, and for the attacker to suffer some rather harsh consequences, regardless of what some think about it or the motives or "angle" involved.

The reason why the girl & little boy were maliciously & barbarically attacked & beaten is secondary to the fact that they were, even though it is obvious, and to deny it is purely pathetic, hypocritical chicken shite. No matter, though; the crime is heinous enough, in & of itself. "Perceived angle" has no bearing on desired severity of the punishment. But those who have the audacity to even suggest that act of savage violence perpetrated on innocent victims, especially a small child, isn't severe enough to warrant the outrage it is getting, and who play the race card by saying the only reason there is such outrage is because the attacker is black, are exactly what is wrong regarding this issue. They are the problem because if they can say this horrendous, premeditated, unwarranted act of violence should not be judged & punished harshly, and is being exaggerated based on the assailant being black, they are the ones with the race & bigotry issues, and their banter should be ignored.

Idk, but I don't understand it. I think there is another one, a "part 2," on here, but not sure if anchored or gone.