Started By
Message

re: Why "Women and Children first"?

Posted on 6/3/22 at 2:15 pm to
Posted by td1
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
3171 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 2:15 pm to
In todays world it would be harder to determine who stay on the ship and who would get off. I bet all the real women would become biologist with a quickness in that scenario.
Posted by auwaterfowler
Alabama
Member since Jan 2020
2866 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 2:16 pm to
Love that album
Posted by Abstract Queso Dip
Member since Mar 2021
5878 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 2:24 pm to
Women must carry the child. 4 men can repopulate a nation as long as there are a couple thousand women. You'll need to force genetic. We would need to make sure that the genetic pools are diverse. Like only pool A children can procreate with pool B children. C children can reproduce with D children. Then the next generation A1 needs to crossover and breed with C1 children's... And so on and so forth This will reduce genetic deformities down the line. Ideally you want a few more men but that is how it works. In plants it's called hybrid vigor. Not sure what it is called in animals but a stud horse makes
many more millions of dollars from its semen than just winning the Derby.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Love that album



Some will get it.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram