- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The self-driving Uber in the Arizona crash was hit crossing an intersection on yellow
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:13 am to NYNolaguy1
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:13 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Is there another set of rules they should be going by?
the computer lacks the ability to notice that everyone was letting the woman cross their lanes. its still her fault but a human (one that is paying attention) may be better equipped here. i agree.
i also think that a retard would be worse than the computer car
3
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:14 am to RedRifle
Seems to me we need to get rid of women drivers and keep driverless cars.
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:18 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
its still her fault but a human (one that is paying attention) may be better equipped here. i agree.
So in other words because humans don't follow the rules, a human driver can spot it better?
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:19 am to NYNolaguy1
These numb nuts defending the woman fail to see the fact that the woman hit the uber car, not the other way around.
This post was edited on 3/30/17 at 11:21 am
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:20 am to Nado Jenkins83
The issue here is not self-driving cars, it is human drivers. In the future when all cars are self-driving, this will not be an issue.
There will be no need even for traffic lights.
There will be no need even for traffic lights.
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:20 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
So in other words because humans don't follow the rules, a human driver can spot it better?
i guess you are oblivious to these scenarios like the computer was.
must be nice to not notice shite going on around you.
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:21 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
The issue here is not self-driving cars, it is human drivers. In the future when all cars are self-driving, this will not be an issue.
There will be no need even for traffic lights.
good thing we won't see this day. as i will not give up my right to drive.
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:23 am to Nado Jenkins83
By your posts, you're probably 60+ so your opinion doesn't really matter on this issue.
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:24 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
i will not give up my right to drive.
Driving is not a right...
Said by DWI advocates everywhere.
Also, I doubt it will be a choice for individuals to make. All they have to do is null and void all drivers licenses by a certain date and mandate only autonomous vehicles on the road.
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:25 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
the computer lacks the ability to notice that everyone was letting the woman cross their lanes. its still her fault but a human (one that is paying attention) may be better equipped here. i agree.
Where in this picture does it show you "everyone" was letting her cross and how exactly you would have done much better consider the woman hit the car as it was passing? You would have gotten her attention better?
This post was edited on 3/30/17 at 11:27 am
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:25 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
By your posts, you're probably 60+ so your opinion doesn't really matter on this issue.
nope try again.
are you on the traffic/driverless car council of america or something?
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:26 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
guess you are oblivious to these scenarios like the computer was.
I guess so?
quote:
must be nice to not notice shite going on around you.
Like the incoming future of autonomous vehicles?
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:27 am to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:
Cole managed to drive across the first two lanes, which were backed up with cars, and thought she was clear to cross the third.
sounds like it was heavy traffic and the drawing doesn't depict this
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:28 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Driving is not a right...
Said by DWI advocates everywhere.
Also, I doubt it will be a choice for individuals to make. All they have to do is null and void all drivers licenses by a certain date and mandate only autonomous vehicles on the road.
Ok then I'll just drive and lets see if the computerized cop cars can give chase.
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:28 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Like the incoming future of autonomous vehicles?
yall love this subject but who is gonna pay for it?
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:29 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
sounds like it was heavy traffic and the drawing doesn't depict this
So the Uber was doing 38 mph in heavy traffic? Ok....
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:29 am to RedRifle
Not even advanced robots can predict women drivers
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:31 am to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:
So the Uber was doing 38 mph in heavy traffic? Ok....
its says those two lanes were blocked with traffic.
i didn't make this up retardo
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:32 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
yall love this subject but who is gonna pay for it?
The same people that buy cars now.
The real people that are worried about this technology are the insurance companies and the popo. No tickets, no reasonable suspicion for a stop, much fewer accidents on the roads...
I mean maybe I am missing the downsides here?
Posted on 3/30/17 at 11:33 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
are you on the traffic/driverless car council of america or something?
No, but 100 years ago, you would have been on the Horse and Buggy Council of America.
"They can have my buggy whip when they take it from my cold, dead hands."
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News