- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sorry Baton Rouge: Lake Charles gets a new river bridge first, DOTD officials say
Posted on 12/19/20 at 1:29 pm to Brummy
Posted on 12/19/20 at 1:29 pm to Brummy
quote:
Meanwhile in St. Francisville:
That bridge had nothing to do with BR, or its needs though. It was allotted and promised to the farmers and what not in that area for a long time prior to construction even commencing.
Posted on 12/19/20 at 1:29 pm to Brummy
quote:
Meanwhile in St. Francisville:
That is the most cars ever on that bridge at one time. Glad they captured in a photo.
Posted on 12/19/20 at 2:30 pm to SPEEDY
Baton Rouge needs a new bridge in the Plaquemine area.
The Lake Charles bridge is supposed to be structurally unstable, which is why they are going to try to replace it with a wider and lower deck. I'd argue that the Lake Charles area needs a 3rd bridge somewhere south of Carlyss too.
The Lake Charles bridge is supposed to be structurally unstable, which is why they are going to try to replace it with a wider and lower deck. I'd argue that the Lake Charles area needs a 3rd bridge somewhere south of Carlyss too.
Posted on 12/19/20 at 2:31 pm to Brummy
quote:
Meanwhile in St. Francisville:
St. Francisville and New Roads consistently pushed for a new bridge in that area for about 40 years.
You still have some assholes in Ibberville parish that want the new bridge in one particular spot where it would be far less useful. No consensus yet.
Posted on 12/19/20 at 3:14 pm to BorrisMart
quote:
Meanwhile in St. Francisville:
quote:I think there's approx. 3,000 cars per day that cross the St. Francisville bridge. Meanwhile, in Madisonville, that little 2-lane, 40-year-old swing bridge that people have been bitching about for over 25 years has over 16,000 (sixteen thousand) crossings per day.
That bridge had nothing to do with BR, or its needs though. It was allotted and promised to the farmers and what not in that area for a long time prior to construction even commencing.
Posted on 12/19/20 at 4:31 pm to tigerpawl
quote:
think there's approx. 3,000 cars per day that cross the St. Francisville bridge. Meanwhile, in Madisonville, that little 2-lane, 40-year-old swing bridge that people have been bitching about for over 25 years has over 16,000 (sixteen thousand) crossings per day.
That is irrelevant that project and the money for it has nothing to do with any other bridge projects. Madisonville has a bridge though, while it sounds like it isn't great, there was no bridge in St. Francisville and you had to drive up to Natchez or down to BR on either side in between. Not saying there aren't areas more worthy of a bridge but that bridge had been planned long ago and the residents continued to fight for it and ensure that it was built. That area will grow and the bridge will be more useful in the future as more people move out of the BR area. BR has had opportunity to fix their issues but they get voted down or die on the vine.
Posted on 12/19/20 at 5:15 pm to The Boat
quote:
It’s going to be nice as hell in a million years when they extend the bridge to golden meadow then extend 4 laned 3235 all the way from its current ending in Larose to highway 90 near Raceland. After that you’ll have a nice quick express trip to Grand Isle instead of having to take 308 for a stretch.
That will be nice too, but there are 2 big hurdles for that to come into fruition. You need to construct a bridge over the intracoastal and either the Company Canal in Lockport or another bridge over Bayou Lafourche.
If I recall what someone told me from the LA 1 Coalition was that the plan for 3235 is to cross the intracoastal where it terminates and then head north for a few miles and then curve back to LA and cross Bayou Lafourche near Valentine and then follow the old railroad right away to US 90. Either route you still need to construct 2 high level bridges.
One crazy idea to save money was that someone suggested that they construct a second overpass on the 308 side and use the new Larose lift bridge that was constructed about 7 years ago.
If you ask me, that is another problem with the state sometimes the state’s traffic problem disappears. Someone posted about the Audubon bridge in St. Francisville, and that project was part of a much larger project that was to create another major East West route along LA 10, but that never came be. Also, traffic counts were way over estimated.
The same is true for the LA 1 project. I think they should come up with a phased approach for the Northern section. Instead of a 4 lane at first, you may need just a 2 lane bypass with limited access and still plan for a 4 lane. This what they did for the Donaldsonville to Boutte road along the River. Right now, there isn’t enough traffic to support a full 4 lane on that section of future road.
Cleaning up the intersection would go a long way in improving traffic and travel times.
DOTD really shite the bed on the new crossovers on 3235. Getting around is so much a hassle. DOTD essentially eliminated all southbound stoplights and put crossover controls and J turns at certain intersections.
Some people don’t even pay mind to the crossover controls just jump the curve to get to their destination. The problem with 3235 is driveways, you have 65 MPH traffic meeting slow or stopped traffic turning into driveways.
This post was edited on 12/19/20 at 5:53 pm
Popular
Back to top

1






