- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should YOU even be allowed to have children? (eugenics discussion)
Posted on 12/28/15 at 12:20 pm to GRTiger
Posted on 12/28/15 at 12:20 pm to GRTiger
quote:
It's actually an either/or scenario, since you wouldn't need to take the second test if you passed the first.
You really don't understand. Trust me on this one.
1
Posted on 12/28/15 at 12:22 pm to Pecker
You're going backwards, pecker. Trust me on this one.
I can see why you set the IQ standard so low relative to the physical. I bet you lift like a baw.
I can see why you set the IQ standard so low relative to the physical. I bet you lift like a baw.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 12:26 pm to GRTiger
Did you, or did you not say that?
i think you felt stupid after saying that and now you're trying to be petty and make an argument over whether or not where's a difference between passing physical ability test or aptitude tests. No one cares, baw. Let it go.
quote:
It's actually an either/or scenario, since you wouldn't need to take the second test if you passed the first.
i think you felt stupid after saying that and now you're trying to be petty and make an argument over whether or not where's a difference between passing physical ability test or aptitude tests. No one cares, baw. Let it go.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 12:32 pm to Pecker
That is absolutely true. I can have as many kids as I want if I pass the first test and stop there. This is of course excluding the initial psych exam which we both agreed was not being discussed at that point, since you had finally clarified after your unclear use of the number of groups that it was a prerequisite for the actual attribute tests. I hope we both agree that the lack of mental issues is not the presence of an attribute, but the lack of a disqualifying condition.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 12:35 pm to GRTiger
It's a fictitious scenario. One in which I would not allow you to have children, under any circumstances.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 12:46 pm to Pecker
Now you're breaking all sorts of rules. Don't be mad, pecker from Tennessee, one of the dumbest and fattest states in the country.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 12:55 pm to GRTiger
Definite weakness in logic for assuming that I'm "from" TN based on my being an alumnus (which you could not have known) or simply by my having the emblem next to my username. Ad hominem attacks also suggest weakness on your part. I'm sorry for any children you may have now or in the future (if you intend to do so). The spreading of your weak seed is exactly what I was trying to prevent in my fictitious scenario. I can only pray that you haven't already infected the population.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 12:56 pm to Pecker
very few people make it in the Ranger training. makes no sense to use that as a criterion.
normal good health.
and a much higher intelligence, and particularly, aptitude for math or languages. we want a lot of Bill Gates and a lot of excellent negotiators.
normal good health.
and a much higher intelligence, and particularly, aptitude for math or languages. we want a lot of Bill Gates and a lot of excellent negotiators.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 1:39 pm to Pecker
Another sad troll that cries "ad hominem" after insulting the intelligence of other posters. You are clearly weak in the mind, pecker from Tennessee. Better shape up before your Nazi tests, pecker from Tennessee.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 1:47 pm to GRTiger
pissy because I said you couldnt shite out more worthless kids in my fictitious scenario Posted on 12/28/15 at 1:55 pm to Pecker
Just having fun at your expense. Every time you step out of your dream world you look below average and bumbling.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 1:59 pm to GRTiger
This is coming from a guy who took my dream scenario so seriously he was trying to find loopholes in it. Then tried to call me out on being from a state that i'm not from. Dream scenario or not, you shouldn't have more children. I know you have them. And I know I'm going to have to pay for them to do nothing.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 2:11 pm to Pecker
It's not the content of your post, but the false sense of superiority. I'd probably frick with you regardless of what you were to say if you always take that tone. Proudly ignorant people annoy me.
And how Tennessee redneck of you to mention income and paying taxes. "Ah pay muh taxes" as some sort of accomplishment is the rallying cry of poor white trash.
And how Tennessee redneck of you to mention income and paying taxes. "Ah pay muh taxes" as some sort of accomplishment is the rallying cry of poor white trash.
Posted on 12/28/15 at 2:26 pm to GRTiger
I'm not sure what you're babbling about. I'm just trying to save everyone else from more inconvenience. Your children are probably young, and we both know how it's going to turn out. Look, the next time one of them brings home a C in English class I want you to remember this thread. And when you look that mistake in the eyes, remember that you could have prevented it.
Page 5 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News