Started By
Message

re: Seriously how is it going to play out with the US national debt?

Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:13 pm to
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29164 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

Time to cut defense spending and get serious



Absolutely. There is no reason we have to spend what we do other than welfare for the military industrial complex.
Posted by AA77
Member since Jan 2016
3796 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

She


A woman doing math LOL!
Posted by jdeval1
Member since Dec 2009
7525 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

Based on quarterly data released by the US Treasury, the debt at the end of 2008 — just before Obama took office — stood at roughly $10,699,805,000,000. As of the third quarter of 2016, the most recent data available, the debt as Obama is set to leave office stood at $19,573,445,000,000.

LINK
Posted by Emiliooo
Member since Jun 2013
5148 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Obama ran up more debt than all other presidents that proceeded him combined. The debt grew 86% in 8 years

While he did run up the national debt 86%, I don't think it's just to measure this in absolute terms. Rather, you should measure his presidency for the debt HE and Congress actually created (not which he was sustaining).

Should you attribute blame to him for raising debt to fund the increasing cost of mandatory programs such as social security, defense spending, etc? Should you attribute blame to him for raising debt to fund our activities in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Middle East?

If you want to see what HIS policies attributed to the national debt, you should look at the Congressional Budget Office database. His biggest contributions to national debt were in the form of tax cuts, investments in public infrastructure, renewable energy tax cuts, and the Affordable Care Act (the ACA costs $94B per year).

So I do agree that the debt increased 86% over during the Obama era, but not all that was directly attributed to him and his policies.
Posted by Senior Sidewalker
Member since Oct 2017
722 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

the current debt/ defecit is obviously unsustainable. 


Is it? Why?

The French have run a deficit every year since the 1970s
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29164 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Eventually we will get involved in a massive war that we won't be able to afford to keep up with. Our enemy will advance and we won't. Then....



That seems like just trying to justify waste and bloated fed government.
Posted by jdeval1
Member since Dec 2009
7525 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:19 pm to
Bush was a fan of big government too. I didn't say that he didn't have any hand in it.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

While he did run up the national debt 86%, I don't think it's just to measure this in absolute terms. Rather, you should measure his presidency for the debt HE and Congress actually created (not which he was sustaining). 

Should you attribute blame to him for raising debt to fund the increasing cost of mandatory programs such as social security, defense spending, etc? Should you attribute blame to him for raising debt to fund our activities in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Middle East? 

If you want to see what HIS policies attributed to the national debt, you should look at the Congressional Budget Office database. His biggest contributions to national debt were in the form of tax cuts, investments in public infrastructure, renewable energy tax cuts, and the Affordable Care Act (the ACA costs $94B per year). 

So I do agree that the debt increased 86% over during the Obama era, but not all that was directly attributed to him and his policies.


Exactly.

The fact is the dems are 10x more fiscally responsible than the republicans and this goes back decades.

Reagan - started the debt explosion with tax cuts and massive spending increases.

HW Bush - Did a decent job, kept spending, didn't compound the problem with tax cuts.

Clinton - Tax hikes, kept spending about the same, surplus.

Bush 2 - Massive spending increases, two rounds of large tax cuts for the wealthy. Terrible policy, exploded debt.

Obama - Decreased discressionary spending significantly, tax increases. Yearly deficit was dropping when he left.

Trump - just lol. Worst ever. Huge corporate tax cuts at a time when corps are sitting on most money in history and massive spending increases when the economy is at full employment. Potential to be dumbest economic policy in US history. Inflation here we come.
Posted by Emiliooo
Member since Jun 2013
5148 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:23 pm to
Well then, you shouldn't also make blanket statements like Obama run up the national debt 86%.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

quote:
the current debt/ defecit is obviously unsustainable. 



Is it? Why? 


When debt reaches about 120% of GDP it begins to choke and crush an economy with the interest payments.

Did you pay any attention to the austerity in Greece, Italy, and the UK several years ago? It was painful for them. We are heading in that direction. US debt to GDP ratio breeches 100% last year. With the current tax cuts and spending increases, we are about to jump up significantly higher.

I'm telling you, very large tax increases to individuals are on the horizon in the near future. Book it.
This post was edited on 2/9/18 at 12:28 pm
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:32 pm to
If you are going to spend spend spend, you do not make the problem worse with tax cuts.

Either cut taxes and spending, increase taxes and spend, or keep taxes the same and cut spending. Those are the only options with out debt.

Unfortunately every time we get a republican administration, it is spend spend spend and cut taxes and see how much the debt can get jacked up until the dems take control again and raise taxes to try and unfrick the debt.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29164 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

The fact is the dems are 10x more fiscally responsible than the republicans and this goes back decades.


Crazy to think about but you do have a point. Dems are extremely fiscally irresponsible as well don’t get me wrong, but there are very few true fiscal conservatives. Everyone loves spending, it’s just a question on what it’s spent on. And the tax cuts are fiscally irresponsible.
Posted by Cocotheape
Member since Aug 2015
3782 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:34 pm to
These tax cuts coupled with no spending decreases (or in our case, spending increases) are the 8 year note on a $60k truck. Monthly payment looks good now though, so baws like it.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
21893 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:35 pm to
fricking cut government employee pensions. Got to traditional 401k and other retirement accounts.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:36 pm to
Yep. Ftr, I've been a republican most of my life. About 10 years or so I turned 100% against them, solely because they are truly much less fiscally responsible than Dems despite their lip service.

And at the end of the day, what I care about is my money and I do not want to pay an assload in taxes in the near future to make up for their stupidity, but now I'm resigned to taking it in the arse with huge tax increases in a few years
Posted by Emiliooo
Member since Jun 2013
5148 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

And the tax cuts are fiscally irresponsible.

Not necessarily, if the point of a tax cut is to stimulate the economy by putting more dollars in peoples pockets to spend, then go for it.

You DON'T push forward tax cuts when the economy is healthy and active.
Posted by jdeval1
Member since Dec 2009
7525 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Unfortunately every time we get a republican administration, it is spend spend spend and cut taxes and see how much the debt can get jacked up until the dems take control again and raise taxes to try and unfrick the debt.





quote:

President Obama's healthcare law will spend about $2 trillion over the next decade on expanding insurance coverage but still leave 31 million Americans uninsured, according to an analysis from the Congressional Budget Office released on Monday.
Posted by Celery
Nuevo York
Member since Nov 2010
11087 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:38 pm to
Eventually China will just buy the US and pay off our debt in monthly installments.
Posted by Senior Sidewalker
Member since Oct 2017
722 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:39 pm to


So you look at this chart and see the 7% slice of debt service as the problem? Ok
Posted by LSUJuice
Back in Houston
Member since Apr 2004
17668 posts
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:41 pm to
But Hannity and Rush tell me that tax cuts lead to increased circulation in the economy, more and higher paying jobs, and thus higher government revenue despite the cuts. I guess that's flawed?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram