- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Serious question, death penalty?
Posted on 5/18/18 at 6:22 pm to fr33manator
Posted on 5/18/18 at 6:22 pm to fr33manator
Washington it's lethal injection, unless the inmate requests hanging. The last hanging to take place was January 25, 1996 in Delaware.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 6:41 pm to kengel2
What would happen if a judge just straight up said "Yep, you're guilty, no reason to keep you around, officers, take him out back and put two bullets in his head right now."
Posted on 5/18/18 at 6:43 pm to kengel2
I’m ok with getting rid of capital punishment if we make the penalty for murder (homicide other than self defense or accidental) a mandatory life sentence. Parole boards should be abolished. You do the crime then you do the FULL time. Judges should have no say as to the sentences. Prison sentences should set by the legislature with fixed terms (no ranges), and should be enforced immediately after the person’s guilt has been established.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 6:56 pm to kengel2
I am for the death penalty in principle.
The problem is the long and documented history of corrupt police officers and prosecutors railroading innocent people.
The problem is the long and documented history of corrupt police officers and prosecutors railroading innocent people.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 6:59 pm to Peazey
Yep and oddly enough eye witness accounts are wrong more often than logic dictates.
quote:
Since the 1990s, when DNA testing was first introduced, Innocence Project researchers have reported that 73 percent of the 239 convictions overturned through DNA testing were based on eyewitness testimony. One third of these overturned cases rested on the testimony of two or more mistaken eyewitnesses.
This post was edited on 5/18/18 at 7:00 pm
Posted on 5/18/18 at 7:00 pm to messyjesse
It would be a violation of due process. Some people think that they can ignore due process when it suits their whims. Other people have integrity.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 7:11 pm to memphis tiger
I'm with you on that, but what about the clear cut cases like the murder is on video?
That should be instant. Take em out back and just bury them.
That should be instant. Take em out back and just bury them.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 7:11 pm to memphis tiger
quote:
The problem is the long and documented history of corrupt police officers and prosecutors railroading innocent people.
It's not even that. I mean that is horrible, but it's not even the largest part of the story. It's more so the fallible nature of humans and human institutions. Even if you assume the best of intentions, which can frequently be a stretch, humans are fallible and will make mistakes. "Never attribute to malice what can be sufficiently explained by incompetence."
When someone says that they support the death penalty as an institution what they are saying is that they think that a vengeful concept of justice is so important to them that they are willing to sacrifice innocent lives for it. Because it is inevitable and completely unavoidable, just from an observation of statistical inference, that such policy will inevitably kill innocent people if you even open the door to it in any way whatsoever.
The "only sure thing" people are ignoring the very point of the argument that mistakes inevitably occur even when people think they are completely sure. That's how we got in the position that we currently are in. People think they are already only doing sure things, and they are still fricking up in the most egregious way possible. They are irrationally following injustice with even greater injustice for nothing more than the sake of emotional satisfaction.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 7:31 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
quote:
Because our prison system is for-profit and the powers that be want to squeeze every last tax payer dime out of a prisoner before executing them.
That's why it takes 15 years to execute someone even after appeals are finished. That's why we use expensive proprietary drugs instead of something cheap like gallows, guillotine, firing squad, etc.
Follow the money.
THIS TRANSMISSION WAS BROUGHT TO YOU BY INFOWARS
Of all things, you think the private prison system, which requires a certain capacity to be filled, is a conspiracy theory...??? Private prisons are tax dollar farms. Fact.
Posted on 5/18/18 at 7:59 pm to dbeck
quote:frick all that...a mixture of heroin and bleach is cheap and would do just fine.
That's why we use expensive proprietary drugs
Popular
Back to top

0






