- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nobel prize 'horse paste' that costs 3c/dose reduces Covid death by 70%, infections by 44%
Posted on 3/15/22 at 1:42 pm to Guess_who
Posted on 3/15/22 at 1:42 pm to Guess_who
The problem with ivermectin is that it is cheap .Fauci and his co-conspirators buried it because there was no money to be made.The msm was enlisted to disparage it as horse wormer.
There was so much positive info about ivermectin but it was difficult to get human preparations so people turned to Tractor Supply.I did so myself,I could possibly have gotten human version but it was just easier to go to Tractor Supply.
Therein is where the problem came in.Lots people buying horse paste and it is difficult to properly dose.There is Ivermectin Plus which contains an additional wormer and it is only safe for cattle.I suspect some people bought that and got into trouble.
I bought injectable form but is sterile but given orally safely to almost all animals.Even chickens.
Dogs of the collie breeds can’t take it.
I knew how to calculate a safe dose but many people don’t.I read about one idiot that gave it to himself IV and quickly ended up in hospital.It is never given IV to any animals.I don’t know where he got that idea but it was stupid.
The whole deal concerning ivermectin is criminal imo.It is not 100% effective but no drug is.Studies I read indicated it was very effective if given early.
It’s safe and wouldn’t hurt if properly dosed.
The LD 50 for beagles is 80 mg /kg.which is a massive dose.
Duke University has instituted a study and on their press release they had info on ivermectin.They stated “It has been used safely in millions of people and has been used at doses as high as 800 mcg/kg either as a single dose or over a week period”
The dose I took was 40 mcg/kg .
The trial Duke has started is ACTIVE-6.I seriously doubt the study will be positive for ivermectin,especially if Fauci remains.They would never get another penny of the billions of grant money he passes out and thereby controls every branch of healthcare-CDC,NIH,FDA .
Anyone want to get a serious case of red arse read RFK,Jr book-THE REAL Anthony FAUCI.
There was so much positive info about ivermectin but it was difficult to get human preparations so people turned to Tractor Supply.I did so myself,I could possibly have gotten human version but it was just easier to go to Tractor Supply.
Therein is where the problem came in.Lots people buying horse paste and it is difficult to properly dose.There is Ivermectin Plus which contains an additional wormer and it is only safe for cattle.I suspect some people bought that and got into trouble.
I bought injectable form but is sterile but given orally safely to almost all animals.Even chickens.
Dogs of the collie breeds can’t take it.
I knew how to calculate a safe dose but many people don’t.I read about one idiot that gave it to himself IV and quickly ended up in hospital.It is never given IV to any animals.I don’t know where he got that idea but it was stupid.
The whole deal concerning ivermectin is criminal imo.It is not 100% effective but no drug is.Studies I read indicated it was very effective if given early.
It’s safe and wouldn’t hurt if properly dosed.
The LD 50 for beagles is 80 mg /kg.which is a massive dose.
Duke University has instituted a study and on their press release they had info on ivermectin.They stated “It has been used safely in millions of people and has been used at doses as high as 800 mcg/kg either as a single dose or over a week period”
The dose I took was 40 mcg/kg .
The trial Duke has started is ACTIVE-6.I seriously doubt the study will be positive for ivermectin,especially if Fauci remains.They would never get another penny of the billions of grant money he passes out and thereby controls every branch of healthcare-CDC,NIH,FDA .
Anyone want to get a serious case of red arse read RFK,Jr book-THE REAL Anthony FAUCI.
Posted on 3/15/22 at 1:46 pm to jmon
quote:
Were people making fun of Ivermectin as a treatment or the fact that people were going to Tractor Supply to buy horse ivermectin and dosing based upon a facebook prescriptions?
You're joking, right?
Posted on 3/15/22 at 1:46 pm to Earnest_P
quote:
So your posts ITT trying to get people to discount the studies aren’t about the studies themselves? You’re talking about where they are published.
only in part. please go back to my original where i stated 2 of 3 are retrospective only and would at best only prove correlation (this really isnt a good thing, or bad thing, just a thing). The other is observational only. neither actually prove ivermectin itself has any affect what so ever.
the impact factor is just a little extra there. if they actually showed anything of any importance on such a hot topic, it would have been submitted to and published by something much more worthwhile. the fact the authors chose these journals to publish in says exactly what they think of their own study.
This post was edited on 3/15/22 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 3/15/22 at 1:55 pm to caro81
quote:
published by something much more worthwhile
Would it, though? Maybe a place like the Lancet, which published a bullshite letter painting the lab leak theory as dangerous conspiracy.
And where are the higher quality studies?
It’s the dog that didn’t bark.
Posted on 3/15/22 at 2:03 pm to Earnest_P
quote:
And where are the higher quality studies?
being performed as we speak.
as for the lancet article, havent read it and dont know of it but quick google search has this right on their page.
"To be clear, the lab leak theory was and remains a perfectly legitimate line of inquiry."
is it opinion based? comparing opinion articles with scientific peer review now? is that where we are going with this discussion?
Posted on 3/15/22 at 10:07 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
My vaccination was worthless.
Maybe. Maybe not. There is some credible data that the vaccine significantly reduces both hospitalizations and death.
quote:
Of course, it was touted as something to prevent the spread at the time, which was a lie.
No argument from me there. If Fauci's lips are moving, he is lieing.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)