- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:57 am to jangalang
Frick you tard. I did not wish to do this, but
The military did not decide to reject the AR-10 due to weight of round fricktard. They asked Armalite to design the weapon for a round that caused less muzzle rise so that suppression fire would be more effective. 7.62×51 is lighter than the 30-06 used in WWII and our boys carried that with no issue.
quote:
Do you understand why our military went to 5.56?
The military did not decide to reject the AR-10 due to weight of round fricktard. They asked Armalite to design the weapon for a round that caused less muzzle rise so that suppression fire would be more effective. 7.62×51 is lighter than the 30-06 used in WWII and our boys carried that with no issue.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:57 am to RogerTheShrubber
I stand by my question that was ignored earlier(she usually refusing to answer any of my questions) that she gets off on the abuse.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:59 am to jangalang
quote:
Are you saying it’s not?
Shows pic of actual machine gun, claims it has something to do with the round.
Youre an idiot.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:59 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
The difference is negligible in 30 rd mag.
So why did the military move to 5.56, shite for brains?
You do realize that a 5.56 bullet is maybe 60 grain while 7.62 could be 130? That’s fricking double.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:00 am to pankReb
quote:
I stand by my question that was ignored earlier(she usually refusing to answer any of my questions) that she gets off on the abuse.
Classic attention seeking behavior. Being wrong isn't a problem for a woman.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:00 am to jangalang
quote:
Are you saying it’s not?
With muzzle velocity below 2800 fps of the 150 gr fmj, I would say no. It is not high power. It is middle of the road. Effective, but still middle of the road.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:01 am to jangalang
quote:
You do realize that a 5.56 bullet is maybe 60 grain while 7.62 could be 130? That’s fricking double
Look you stolen valor fricktard. If you cannot even get the weights of the projectiles you supposedly used correctly, stop talking.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:04 am to jangalang
quote:
You do realize that a 5.56 bullet is maybe 60 grain while 7.62 could be 130? That’s fricking double
You'd never feel the difference unless you are packing an entire ammo box, like the military does.
You have no clue what you are talking about.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:05 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Shows pic of actual machine gun, claims it has something to do with the round.
And rounds lol.
Is .308 not also considered high powered? If it isn’t are y’all drunk? It can knock down elk, most of anything you care to shoot at.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:06 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You'd never feel the difference unless you are packing an entire ammo box, like the military does.
You know nothing about the military. Stop talking as such.
You would definitely feel the difference between toting 5.56 and 7.62.
Stop embarrassing yourself.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:07 am to UtahCajun
quote:?????
Look you stolen valor fricktard. If you cannot even get the weights of the projectiles you supposedly used correctly, stop talking.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:07 am to jangalang
quote:
Is .308 not also considered high powered?
Throwing a 180 gr round at 2600 fps, no it is not.
If youre shooting 130 gr varmint rounds at 3100 fps, yes.
So, it depends.
You need to learn more about the things you want to force on other people
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:08 am to jangalang
quote:
You would definitely feel the difference between toting 5.56 and 7.62.
I'm not a pussy like you. No issue toting 100 rounds of 762.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:08 am to RogerTheShrubber
Once again……her opinion is entirely irrelevant.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:11 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I'm not a pussy like you. No issue toting 100 rounds of 762.
You are a keyboard warrior, fake hard bro with the cold hands mindset. We all see it.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:12 am to jangalang
quote:
Do you understand why our military went to 5.56?
Yes, jungle warfare meant a lot of suppressive fire.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:12 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Throwing a 180 gr round at 2600 fps, no it is not.
Yes it is. It does its job fine at whatever I want to shoot at.
Just because there are higher powered rounds doesn’t mean mine isn’t.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:13 am to jangalang
quote:
Yes it is. It does its job fine at whatever I want to shoot at.
Thats not a definition of any "power" of rifle or round, Che.
This post was edited on 4/18/23 at 8:14 am
Posted on 4/18/23 at 8:14 am to RogerTheShrubber
*plays call of duty one time. Decides to have strong opinions 
Page 55 of 74
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News