re: Missouri issues ALERT and goes on lockdown after racist threat goes out

Did they not want media in the hunger strike tent camp because they were afraid they'd find people gorging on food?

Rando, you should respond to her.

quote:

---

Mizzou Protest Is Total Charade

TRIGGER WARNING

Not content to just engage in a dumb protest with no cogent political goals, the Mizzou protest officially hit post-satire status this afternoon when Mizzou faculty members -- including a communications professor currently doing a research study on 50 Shades of Grey -- bullied a student journalist who had the audacity to take photographs of protesters in a public place.

You know, as he's constitutionally allowed to do under the First Amendment.

---

quote:

---

Shortly after this confrontation the official Twitter account of the protest tweeted this:

It's typically white media who don't understand the importance of respecting black spaces.
— ConcernedStudent1950 (@CS_1950) November 9, 2015

Of course, God forbid an Asian reporter violate your "black spaces." Which, of course, is actually the center of the quad on a university campus. I know this may shock y'all, but it's almost like these protesters don't understand how the Constitution works. And who could have foreseen that the protest against racism would tweet racist things? Uh, everyone.

You should be ashamed of yourself, Mizzou. This is what happens when today's delicate flower children grow up believing that college should be a place where no one ever says anything to make them sad and those of you on campus with working brains don't stand up and call them out for being pathetic losers.

TRIGGER WARNING

YOU GUYS SUCK.

Continue at link:
LINK

---

Fox Sports is smelling the bullshite.

quote:

---

Is the Entire Mizzou Protest Based On Lies?

The first column I wrote on the Mizzou controversy analyzed the allegations and pointed out that firing a president had zero connection to any of the allegations or the demands for the protesters. In that column I accepted the protester's allegations as true. But as the week has gone on and the protesters have been exposed as anti-first amendment, selectively racist, and, last night, willing to perpetrate actual lies to get more attention, isn't it time to examine whether these incidents are actually real?

That is, what if there's actually zero basis for the strike in the first place? What if these alleged incidents never happened and the media just accepted them without asking any questions at all? The entire protest is based on three things, none of which have been independently verified, a poopswastika, an off-campus racial slur, and an on campus racial slur.

So let's examine each of them in order.

1. There is no evidence of the poopswastika.

In this modern era, when college kids take photos of everything, when video emerges of virtually everything that takes place on campus, how is that there is no eye witness who can say that a poopswastika ever even existed?

Not one person.

Read the article linked above, it's exhaustive reporting. There's not one shred of evidence that a poopswastika ever existed. As the article said, it's an immaculate defecation.

Yet it has been reported as truth by every major media outlet in the country.

And, by the way, if the poopswastika did exist, isn't it evidence of a really deranged individual more than its evidence of a campus overrun by racism? Isn't the first thing you think of when you hear of a poopswastika, who the hell put their hands in poop and used it to write on a bathroom wall? If it happened, which there's no evidence that it did, isn't that person who did it probably insane?

2. Mizzou's student body president, Payton Head, a gay black man, accused unknown and never found perpetrators in a red truck of hurling racial slurs at him off campus.

Assuming that this incident even happened, how is Mizzou responsible for what a non-student says off campus?

Isn't it more significant that Mizzou students elected a gay black man campus president? And that Mizzou almost universally supported Michael Sam, a gay black man who became the first athlete to go public with his homosexuality? Does that sound like a campus with inclusiveness issues to you? Would a divided, racist campus have a gay black student as its top representative and have offered nearly universal support and acceptance to Sam?

Moreover, given that Head also reported that the KKK was on campus last night and that he'd been in contact with the national guard -- it's totally normal for a student body president to be the top liason for the national guard, right? -- isn't it also fair to question whether this story is awfully convenient for someone who has political ambitions and gains a ton of positive coverage for it? That is, Head gained an awful lot here.

Continue at link: LINK

---

boom, boom, boom

I must not engage. I must not engage. Must stay away from posting any more tweets today but this is just calling my name and trying to force me to engage.

quote:

---

I feed off of your pigment insecurity.

---

Ah...the art of photoshop

....

Legitimately crying at work

Only problem with the KKK permit issue is that it's still 4 p.m. On the east coast, this would have had to have happened yesterday for it to be reported at 5, so it's obviously not true