- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does anyone here actually believe this “Q” bullshite
Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:25 pm to IceTiger
Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:25 pm to IceTiger
quote:
Revealed Sessions has appointed someone outside of DC (long ago).
quote:
10-Mar-2018
But Huber was appointed in Nov 2017. Four months is "long ago" or am I missing something?
Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:28 pm to IceTiger
quote:
It's why the typical response is, look it up for yourself.
It's a cop out is what it is. In GeorgetheGreek's thread, Q followers, when pushed, did post what they considered compelling evidence. A couple examples that were posted:

Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:31 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
But Huber was appointed in Nov 2017. Four months is "long ago" or am I missing something?
Yes, it wasn't known he was assigned anything until 29 Mar when Sessions sent a letter to Goodlatte saying he has a guy looking into the shite that Goodlatte was bitching about (the coup and stuff)
The Letter...
Q knew weeks before the letter
Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:31 pm to TutHillTiger
We need to find out the identity of everyone in that Q thread and sterilize them
Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:32 pm to IceTiger
Right, but Q also claimed the appointment in question happened "long ago".
Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:37 pm to TutHillTiger
Conspiracy theories are for the weak-minded, people looking for excitement and purpose in their life.
Soothsayers and palm readers have been preying on these kinds of people for millennia. Q is simply the excitement du jour. They’ll segue into another more captivating storyline soon enough.
Soothsayers and palm readers have been preying on these kinds of people for millennia. Q is simply the excitement du jour. They’ll segue into another more captivating storyline soon enough.
This post was edited on 8/15/18 at 7:46 pm
Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:40 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
It's a cop out is what it is. In GeorgetheGreek's thread, Q followers, when pushed, did post what they considered compelling evidence. A couple examples that were posted
There are silly things that people chase...more telling is the newspaper article that might be the reason for the thumbs up...
The clock is mind boggling, I think Q posts to it now to throw the super-autists a bone.
I would not offer that as a "proof"...
The White House Schedule Twitter feed is a better follow for things Q, along with some of the mil branch feeds.
So, take a lot of it with a grain of salt, or just file it away in the "objective info file"...but watching autists dig is an utter joy for me...and many of the things I've speculated about for decades have been proven (to a degree) in the past 8 months...
My favorite is Laura Silsby...runs NGOs to save kids...steals them instead.
Until recently runs Amber alert.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:44 pm to Pecker
quote:
Conspiracy theories
What conspiracy theory?
The inability to detach that term from the subject of this thread is lazy, not objective and biased...it's why the media uses it...for you to associate it as such, and it appears to be working.
You should look up the origins of the term "conspiracy theory".
Q is much more a very passive leak or a government psy-op...it technically doesn't meet the definition of "conspiracy theory".
Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:44 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
There is no liberal deep state pedophilia ring made up of former presidents, the ultra wealthy and Hollywood elite.
Who is John Podesta?
What circles does he run in?
Why is this his artwork?

Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:45 pm to TutHillTiger
Thought this was an impractical jokers thread 
Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:45 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Right, but Q also claimed the appointment in question happened "long ago"
It did happen...4 months prior...
Specifically, "Long ago" is very subjective and shouldn't be the point of analysis.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:47 pm to IceTiger
I just find it odd that after 50k posts that things like that (and there were dozens more just as silly) were the most credible pieces of "evidence" that anyone was able to provide. There must be hundreds of posters in that thread and not one of them was able to do anything but post those ridiculous pictures or tell you to read the entire 50k post thread.
I'm not asking to have every sidebar theory in the thread explained to me. Just a few solid predictions that came true that don't require leaps of logic.
I'm not asking to have every sidebar theory in the thread explained to me. Just a few solid predictions that came true that don't require leaps of logic.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:48 pm to PuntBamaPunt
quote:
Q=bluetunatiger
Q=Tx Tiger
But he hates himself for doing it...
Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:48 pm to IceTiger
quote:
It did happen...4 months prior...
Specifically, "Long ago" is very subjective and shouldn't be the point of analysis.
No one over 10 years old considers four months to be "long ago". Sorry.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:50 pm to TutHillTiger
Honestly I don't know much about it. Isn't it some kind of religious deal? But generally, I am not a conspiracy theorist or have any radical views.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:52 pm to IceTiger
quote:
You should look up the origins of the term "conspiracy theory".
Q is much more a very passive leak or a government psy-op...it technically doesn't meet the definition of "conspiracy theory".
Is this where you pretend there aren’t layers of conspiracy theories wrapped inside of the Q storyline?
The complete lack of self-awareness on your part to suggest that I look into the etymology of “conspiracy theory,” while suggesting that Q is a government psy-op.
You’re much too devout and invested in the Q onion to discuss this topic objectively.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 7:56 pm to DarthRebel
quote:
Who is John Podesta?
What circles does he run in?
Why is this his artwork?
You’re using tricks that psychics use to make broad generalizations and attribute correlation based on minute details. Would you like to discuss the types of personalities that often fall victim to fortune tellers?
Popular
Back to top



1






