Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Archaeo-Hydrology question

Posted on 8/14/16 at 5:13 pm
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
106024 posts
Posted on 8/14/16 at 5:13 pm
Before there was a Mississippi River levee, would part of the Mississippi flow down the Amite system when it overtopped the natural bank? Could this happen again in the event of a levee break? Hypothetically, could the Mississippi permanently divert part or even all of its flow down the Amite watershed in such a scenario?
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
158988 posts
Posted on 8/14/16 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

Could this happen again in the event of a levee break?
Depends on the strength of the bombs President Trump uses
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
20732 posts
Posted on 8/14/16 at 5:17 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 10:41 pm
Posted by crazyLSUstudent
391 miles away from Tiger Stadium
Member since Mar 2012
6201 posts
Posted on 8/14/16 at 5:18 pm to
Bayou Manchac use to connect to the Mississippi river before the levees were built
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
71137 posts
Posted on 8/14/16 at 5:26 pm to
Bayou Manchac was historically a distributary of the Mississippi, connecting it to the Amite River and Lake Maurepas. A percentage of the Mississippi's flow would divert that way when the river was high. When the river was low, a percentage of the Amite's flow would go down Manchac the other way into the Mississippi. It was never a threat to take the primary flow, though.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram