- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Archaeo-Hydrology question
Posted on 8/14/16 at 5:13 pm
Posted on 8/14/16 at 5:13 pm
Before there was a Mississippi River levee, would part of the Mississippi flow down the Amite system when it overtopped the natural bank? Could this happen again in the event of a levee break? Hypothetically, could the Mississippi permanently divert part or even all of its flow down the Amite watershed in such a scenario?
Posted on 8/14/16 at 5:15 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:Depends on the strength of the bombs President Trump uses
Could this happen again in the event of a levee break?
Posted on 8/14/16 at 5:17 pm to Jim Rockford
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 8/14/16 at 5:18 pm to Jim Rockford
Bayou Manchac use to connect to the Mississippi river before the levees were built
Posted on 8/14/16 at 5:26 pm to Jim Rockford
Bayou Manchac was historically a distributary of the Mississippi, connecting it to the Amite River and Lake Maurepas. A percentage of the Mississippi's flow would divert that way when the river was high. When the river was low, a percentage of the Amite's flow would go down Manchac the other way into the Mississippi. It was never a threat to take the primary flow, though.
Popular
Back to top
4







