Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Air Force soon to announce decision on future launch vehicles

Posted on 8/31/18 at 6:02 pm
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31593 posts
Posted on 8/31/18 at 6:02 pm
LINK

Three rocket manufacturers — SpaceX, Orbital ATK (now Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems) and United Launch Alliance — as well as propulsion system supplier Aerojet Rocketdyne received an initial round of research and development contracts. Now the Air Force will have to decide who stays and who goes for the next phase of the program. A new player is now in the mix as Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin reportedly submitted a proposal for its New Glenn rocket.

None of the companies would comment for this story due to the sensitivity of the competition. The Air Force first planned to announce LSA awards in July. Industry sources told SpaceNews that the decision was delayed as the Air Force needed more time to evaluate Blue Origin’s bid.

By most accounts SpaceX is guaranteed to get a piece of the overall LSA funding, estimated at approximately a billion dollars over several years. The Air Force’s most trusted launch supplier, ULA, also is expected to be selected even though it is offering a new vehicle that may not be ready to fly until 2020. The big question is who might get the third award. One source speculated that the Air Force could award Northrop Grumman a contract to keep its Omega rocket alive but might also give Blue Origin seed money to ensure it has some say in the development of New Glenn.
Posted by Fourteen28
Member since Aug 2018
1156 posts
Posted on 8/31/18 at 6:08 pm to
Space travel should have been privatized long ago.

Wouldn’t bother me if NASA just stuck to finding asteroids and comets that could hit Earth.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31593 posts
Posted on 8/31/18 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

NASA just stuck to finding asteroids and comets that could hit Earth.



Needs to be a lot more invested in this. They track this stuff but not near to the extent we need (as chelyabinsk demonstrated).

And shut down the ISS (privatize it really) and divert that money to doing real science/exploration in space
This post was edited on 8/31/18 at 6:13 pm
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
33898 posts
Posted on 8/31/18 at 6:15 pm to
I’m hoping that Bezos gets the deal. Northrop Grumman doesn’t need more government contracts, nor does this really seem like a defense agenda. Idk anything about United Launch Alliance. Aerojet probably isn’t qualified in my opinion. And of course SpaceX is qualified, but I don’t like the idea of giving public money to a company that had been living off the idea that “space has enough value for the private industry without public funding”. To me if Elon is gonna take more public money, he can’t completely justify space as valuable to the private industry at this time

Edit: a part of me is really excited for the idea that Bezos could lead the efforts on the “space elevator”. Now I don’t mean in the literal sense of using a cable from Earth to space, but I do think Bezos could prioritize making it much more efficient to move things from Earth to space, which would enable us to have large scale missions to other planets much easier, if a large amount of our cargo was already in space and could be somehow attached to our vehicle once in space
This post was edited on 8/31/18 at 6:20 pm
Posted by Fourteen28
Member since Aug 2018
1156 posts
Posted on 8/31/18 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

Needs to be a lot more invested in this. They track this stuff but not near to the extent we need (as chelyabinsk demonstrated). And shut down the ISS (privatize it really) and divert that money to doing real science/exploration in space


#preach
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
33898 posts
Posted on 8/31/18 at 7:22 pm to
This topic hasn’t gotten much interest. It sucks, David has a good topic and it gets pushed down the board bc there’s no truck nuts on rockets... yet
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 8/31/18 at 7:25 pm to
We need a moon base
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
118270 posts
Posted on 8/31/18 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

future launch vehicles



quote:

truck nuts



Somewhere between the two is a 10 page thread.

You have to present it correctly to get any traction.
Posted by ThatMakesSense
Fort Lauderdale
Member since Aug 2015
15281 posts
Posted on 8/31/18 at 8:49 pm to
I have a crazy idea. How about the government understands it can and should hire and retain the brightest people rather than contract it to the private sector?

At one time it was an honor to work for the government.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 8/31/18 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

How about the government understands it can and should hire and retain the brightest people rather than contract it to the private sector?


Because competition makes things less costly and more innovative
This post was edited on 8/31/18 at 8:55 pm
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31593 posts
Posted on 8/31/18 at 9:12 pm to
Exactly, the private sector has been huge in developing a cheaper way to orbit. Competition drives innovation, for those that want space developed this is the only way it realistically happens.
Posted by ThatMakesSense
Fort Lauderdale
Member since Aug 2015
15281 posts
Posted on 8/31/18 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

Because competition makes things less costly and more innovative


I agree. I think its a bad look at the end of the day.

If you like what you do, $$ shouldn't matter, go work on the public sector and be an all-star. Recognition, shouldn't matter.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31593 posts
Posted on 8/31/18 at 9:22 pm to
More innovation at a lower cost is a bad look? I’m not following that at all..
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 8/31/18 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

think its a bad look at the end of the day.


Posted by ThatMakesSense
Fort Lauderdale
Member since Aug 2015
15281 posts
Posted on 8/31/18 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

More innovation at a lower cost is a bad look? I’m not following that at all..



Yes. When the government needs to go and buy their tech, it sure is. IMO, it's saying, 'let someone else do the leg work, with subsisides and then we buy it'

It still costing $$$ all the way around.

The this new tech will be put in the hands of people who, creatively couldn't figure it out, and expected to run smoothly?

Good luck.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram