- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 5 year old boy mauled to death
Posted on 10/21/15 at 12:55 am to Grim
Posted on 10/21/15 at 12:55 am to Grim
quote:
People who own pits and have kids are idiots. It's not that most pits turn into killing machines, it's that pits are extremely more likely to attack a person than any other breed.
Incorrect. Pit bulls are just more implicated in more serious injuries. Several different breeds are often involved in human aggressivity.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 12:58 am to rbWarEagle
quote:
Does the increased likelihood of encountering drunk drivers prevent you from driving at night? What about the likelihood of a car accident in general?
Driving at night is a necessity for most people. Owning a pit bull over any other breed is not
quote:
To generalize that because some people have been attacked by pit bulls that all pit bulls are ticking time bombs is to ignore the "nurture" in the nature-nuture combo.
Again, no one is claiming ALL pit bulls or even most pit bulls will attack someone. The fact is, they are much much MUCH more likely to attack a person than any other breed. So there is no good reason to choose a pit over all of the other breeds. How is that so hard to understand?
Posted on 10/21/15 at 1:02 am to Grim
quote:
Driving at night is a necessity for most people. Owning a pit bull over any other breed is not
Fair enough. You forgot to address the rest of the questions, though.
quote:
Again, no one is claiming ALL pit bulls or even most pit bulls will attack someone. The fact is, they are much much MUCH more likely to attack a person than any other breed.
Based on what data? Here is some light reading from the AMVA that might help you clear up some of these inaccuracies: LINK
Posted on 10/21/15 at 1:12 am to Grim
Read the title of that chart.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 1:15 am to rbWarEagle
I did. Clearly pit bulls are far and away the most dangerous breed
Posted on 10/21/15 at 1:16 am to Grim
Oh, so you're not claiming that they are "much much much more likely to attack" than other breeds?
Posted on 10/21/15 at 1:20 am to rbWarEagle
Are you really arguing over semantics? You know I'm referring to severe attacks
Posted on 10/21/15 at 1:25 am to Grim
It's an important distinction. Now that your focus has narrowed, you can see your new point being addressed throughout the thread.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 2:17 am to lsuoilengr
If he would have been shot that would have been big news. This.... not so much. Sad. My heart goes out to the family. I hope the dog as assumed room temperature.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 3:03 am to rbWarEagle
quote:
Does the increased likelihood of encountering drunk drivers prevent you from driving at night?
Ridiculous analogy. A more appropriate one would be, "Does the increased likelihood of encountering drunk drivers prevent you from driving around, after midnight, as often as possible, on New years Eve?".
This post was edited on 10/21/15 at 3:04 am
Posted on 10/21/15 at 3:16 am to lsuoilengr
quote:
The same pit bulls were quarantined for 10 days in December of last year after they bit a 9-year-old girl and her mother as the pair walked by the Aloha Street home, police said.
The dogs allegedly dug a hole below the fence in place and made puncture wounds in the victims' skin, but the injuries did not meet the criteria under Texas law to deem the dogs dangerous, cops said.
Damn. Nice criteria Texas.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 3:31 am to Grim
quote:
People who own pits and have kids are idiots. It's not that most pits turn into killing machines, it's that pits are extremely more likely to attack a person than any other breed. There are hundreds of other breeds you can get that are far less dangerous. Not to mention the fact that pits are ugly as sin. Absolutely no good reason to have one around kids
Pretty interesting facts in the link below. For starters, they test higher than 121 other breeds in temperament tests...
LINK
Posted on 10/21/15 at 4:04 am to Grim
Which"Pitbulls" are a dangerous breed? Until there is dna testing for dog related bites and injuries, the vast majority of dog bites should not be released to the public. The vast majority of witnesses, cops even vets have zero clue what a dogs make-up is, so they incorrectly identify it as a "pitbull".
Posted on 10/21/15 at 4:11 am to TJGator1215
quote:
Which"Pitbulls" are a dangerous breed? Until there is dna testing for dog related bites and injuries, the vast majority of dog bites should not be released to the public. The vast majority of witnesses, cops even vets have zero clue what a dogs make-up is, so they incorrectly identify it as a "pitbull".
This isn't the stupidest shite I've ever read but it's the stupidest shite I've read in a long damn time.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 4:11 am to lsuoilengr
It's clearly the owners fault.
I'm just saying these dogs dindu nuffin
I'm just saying these dogs dindu nuffin
Posted on 10/21/15 at 4:16 am to Grim
quote:
People who own pits and have kids are idiots. It's not that most pits turn into killing machines, it's that pits are extremely more likely to attack a person than any other breed. There are hundreds of other breeds you can get that are far less dangerous. Not to mention the fact that pits are ugly as sin. Absolutely no good reason to have one around kids
LOL
Posted on 10/21/15 at 4:19 am to CtotheVrzrbck
She can call them "pits" all she wants but until a dna test is done the breed is most likely to be a mutt.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 4:37 am to northshorebamaman
In what way? Shouldn't it be of the utmost importance to actually determine the actual makeup of these dogs involved in these attacks? Or is it just easier to label it a pitbull because 99% of the general public is to stupid to understand two dogs can look alike but be two separate breeds.
This post was edited on 10/21/15 at 4:39 am
Popular
Back to top



0






