- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2025 US Armed Forces vs. Peak WW2 US Armed Forces
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:17 am to fr33manator
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:17 am to fr33manator
quote:
Modern Aircraft carrier gets transported back to WW2?
To the Pacific Theater near Pearl Harbor on 12/6/41
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:20 am to WWII Collector
quote:
I believe this is more of a mentality and determination question.
That's what I was thinking, too.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:25 am to weagle1999
quote:
How would this play out?
Slaughter. Absolute slaughter. The 2025 US Armed Forces would obliterate the WWII forces.
Even if you set aside the astronomical advancements in things like naval and air forces and look solely at the ground forces alone, the amount of firepower and battlefield lethality your average infantry or armor battalion has at its disposal today is light years ahead of what WWII era ground forces had. And the ability to coordinate that firepower is again light years ahead of the capabilities of WWII era forces.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 11:04 am to wileyjones
quote:
Dude one modern submarine could take out an entire ww2 fleet. Surely you must be trolling
LOL I you are making a point about todays stuff vs theirs but you might want to check the facts. At the end of WW2 the US had over 6700 warships.
People dont understand what we had built and our manufacturing process was so much greater than any other country. We could build ships faster than the Germans could sink them.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 11:14 am to weagle1999
WWII military was much more efficient and had exponentially better leaders. Personnel were fully bough into the military service and missions. (i.e. structure and CoC worked as smoothly as possible)
2025 Military has better technology and far out numbers in volume, but is lead by political hacks and a great majority of the personnel are not committed to service and only there for the benefits. Personnel with the exception of elite services are less than adequately to poorly trained relying highly on the technology if the weapons system in lieu of advance skill for the average human asset.
2025 Military has better technology and far out numbers in volume, but is lead by political hacks and a great majority of the personnel are not committed to service and only there for the benefits. Personnel with the exception of elite services are less than adequately to poorly trained relying highly on the technology if the weapons system in lieu of advance skill for the average human asset.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 5:32 pm to alphaandomega
quote:Yea.. We built something like 93 aircraft carriers in ww2, plus stuck a few in the Great Lakes just because. All in the span of a couple years.
LOL I you are making a point about todays stuff vs theirs but you might want to check the facts. At the end of WW2 the US had over 6700 warships.
People dont understand what we had built and our manufacturing process was so much greater than any other country. We could build ships faster than the Germans could sink them.
But it doesn't change the fact a single Virginia class boat carries enough firepower to eliminate multiple WW2 era surface fleets. They can drop 40 ICBMs (each with multiple nuclear warheads) on a fleet from hundreds of miles away. Plus they can operate indefinitely, silently, and rearm.
The 6700 number isn't capital ships. Sink a few aircraft carriers and bbs and it'd be effectively over anyway.
Coming to the OT is like taking crazy pills
Posted on 5/22/25 at 5:34 pm to weagle1999
The modern USA might not even suffer a casualty to be honest.
Popular
Back to top


0







