Started By
Message

re: Why no penalty on Davis on the INT?

Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:38 am to
Posted by HeauxBeaux
Member since Mar 2008
5538 posts
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:38 am to
quote:

I'm sure after last season, word has spread around the league to beat the crap out of Graham to take him out of his game

Near the end of the game they showed a clip of about 5 or 6 times when they tried to beat the shite out of him
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16599 posts
Posted on 11/2/14 at 11:56 am to
quote:

It was definitely a cheap shot and I think the purpose was the make Graham disappear because "he's soft"


I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that Graham comes off the line over the middle to start most of his routes. If Calvin, Dez, Julio, etc were in the same position I would expect Davis and other LBers to take the same shot. You always want to try and get in the other WRs head; especially, if they are one of the better ones in the league.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16599 posts
Posted on 11/2/14 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Fair enough but some of the newer rules might as well prohibit anything but two hand touch football, especially when it comes to quarterbacks.


The blind-side block penalty is the first one that comes to mind. The guy is pursuing the play, but because of the angle you are on, you are not allowed to make a "legal" block because the hit may be too hard. Not only is it a bad rule, this is one of the most inconsistently called rules I have seen.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram