re: NFC champs shirts- What the heck is up with that?

quote:

---

I don't see how you don't understand thi

---

what I understand is that you lost the redundancy debate several pages ago and have now shifted to semantics. and using odd examples where important modifiers are left out. Your graph only visually says what I already did. The Divisions are sub sets of the NFC, hence the Cowboys are NFC EAST champs, not NFC champs. So the Cowboys, Vikings, Saints and Cardinals are all DIVISION Champs, with in the NFC. Your graphic lists the important detail of the divisions, with out listing the divisions, your graphic is either incorrect or misleading.

While this has been fun I was close with this:

The statement The New Orleans Saints are NFC Conference champs is redundant. Why? Because we already know the NFC is a conference, so there is no further need to identify it as such. There is no need to avoid confusion with the Vikings, Cardinals or Cowboys who are all division champs with in the NFC. While saying the Cowboys, Vikings, Cardinals and Saints are all champs in the NFC, that is inaccurate without naming the divisions they are all champs of.

My favorite teams are L State U and the New O Saints, and I prefer National CA Association football over the N Football L. I also drive fifty5 m per h in my S Utility V.