- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Mark Ingram will be a beast next year. Who's with me?
Posted on 4/17/13 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 4/17/13 at 12:23 pm
will be a beast next year. that is all.
This post was edited on 4/17/13 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 4/17/13 at 12:23 pm to Shane4689
Might want to change your subject before your thread gets whacked.....
Posted on 4/17/13 at 12:37 pm to Shane4689
I'm with you in spirit. Not in logic.
Posted on 4/17/13 at 12:40 pm to Shane4689
I'm with you, only because he changed his number.
Posted on 4/17/13 at 12:40 pm to sicboy
Considering the current state of our line...two yards and a cloud of dust. At least Reggie would go 15 yards every once in a while before getting hurt or falling down.
Posted on 4/17/13 at 12:47 pm to Shane4689
Hopeful...yes
Confident...no
Confident...no
Posted on 4/17/13 at 12:53 pm to Shane4689
3ypc average with him constantly running into the arse of the lineman.
RB is a position that should have immediate impact in the NFL. Ingram has not done this and if he doesn't put it together this year, he probably never will. I honestly think he's our 3rd or maybe even 4th best back on the roster. PT, Sproles and maybe even Ivory is better than him. Ivory has looked way better than Ingram in limited touches and even started his rookie year.
Still don't understand the logic of taking a RB in the 1st unless he's an Adrian Peterson type back with speed, second gear, power and agility. Ingram definitely wasn't the full package when he came to the Saints. He lacked speed. They're a dime a dozen in the draft and their value is decreased. Every team needs at least 2-3 RBs in this new NFL age.
tl;dr he's starting to look like a bust but we'll know after this year.
RB is a position that should have immediate impact in the NFL. Ingram has not done this and if he doesn't put it together this year, he probably never will. I honestly think he's our 3rd or maybe even 4th best back on the roster. PT, Sproles and maybe even Ivory is better than him. Ivory has looked way better than Ingram in limited touches and even started his rookie year.
Still don't understand the logic of taking a RB in the 1st unless he's an Adrian Peterson type back with speed, second gear, power and agility. Ingram definitely wasn't the full package when he came to the Saints. He lacked speed. They're a dime a dozen in the draft and their value is decreased. Every team needs at least 2-3 RBs in this new NFL age.
tl;dr he's starting to look like a bust but we'll know after this year.
This post was edited on 4/17/13 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 4/17/13 at 12:55 pm to deuce985
No, but Sproles will lead the league in yardage
Posted on 4/17/13 at 1:01 pm to mindbreaker
quote:
Hopeful...yes
Confident...no
yep
Posted on 4/17/13 at 1:13 pm to TexanPete
quote:
I'm with you in spirit. Not in logic.
+1



Back to top
