re: Bunch of stuff from Loomis. Willing to move back, but "not too far"

quote:

---

You don't see the lions taking a LT?! They are about to pay stafford stupid money and they literally have no one at LT to protect him. Gosder Cherilus went to Indy.

---

Not with the defensive talent they have to choose from in the first and the amount of help they need on that side. I see them going LT from the second tier early round 2.

Because their D is way behind their Offense and the have huge needs at LB and secondary.

Chiefs, for example, have a good D, now have a "legit" QB, and have some weapons on offense. LT(assuming Albert is gone) is one of their biggest holes.

I put the Eagles in the Lions shoes. They could use a LT, but they have so many other needs, on top of maybe needing a QB soon as Vick ain't gonna last much longer.

Jags seem set to take Jordan if not trading back, and the Raiders and Browns are sure to take a defensive impact player.

This brings us to the Cards, who have several holes on their line and could honestly go OG if they value them higher. I still think they may go tackle though.

Buffalo is likely to take a QB or OG.

Jets are going offensive or defensive impact player.

As long as one of the top 2 OGs are there, that's who the Titans pick.

I really think the tackle talk is a smokescreen to try to get teams to trade up because many of these teams picking high want to trade back.

I honestly think there's a 50/50 shot, not accounting for trades, that the Cards will take the 2nd top 3 tackle. This is including them maybe not even going tackle.

I think that 9-11 is where Johnson goes. That's only if no one else traded up to get a tackle before then and assuming someone is trading into 9-10 to jump the Chargers. If Johnson makes it to the Chargers I can't see them passing at that point.