- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2018 NFL mock draft 2.0: QBs go 1-2-3 with Sam Darnold leading
Posted on 3/20/18 at 6:56 pm to Believer504
Posted on 3/20/18 at 6:56 pm to Believer504
quote:
Ok, when they draft Barkley with the first pick, I’m goig to remind you of this moment idiot.
Someone is going to bump this if you’re wrong which you most likely are.
Taylor is a bridge QB. They have already have Duke Johnson who is one of better receiving RBs in the league and just recently signed Carlos Hyde. Yeah they could still use Barkley but QB is the more important position and Taylor isn’t the solution.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 7:33 pm to public_enemy
quote:
tyrod Taylor
quote:
franchise qb
Don’t put words in my mouth. Not once did I say he was a franchise QB.
Also if you think I care about anybody on this board or your opinions, you’re really an idiot. I post here for the “hoot” of it. lmao
This post was edited on 3/20/18 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 3/20/18 at 7:51 pm to 1BamaRTR
I honestly forgot about the Hyde signing.. and it just happened smh. That would make drafting Barkley a luxury. Still intriguing to say the least. I really would hate for the Browns to make another bad pick.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 7:53 pm to Believer504
I don't think the Browns could justify Barkley with the #1 pick any other year, but considering they have 1 and 4 they have some options. It really depends on which QB they really like. If they're not high on any particular one and are ok with potentially the 3rd one, why not take Barkley? The Giants could take him at 2.
Not saying I'd necessarily do that, but it's not laughable to think they could.
Not saying I'd necessarily do that, but it's not laughable to think they could.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 9:31 pm to Believer504
But you swore Barkley would be the 1st overall pick. Can't wait to bump this thread when they go qb first overall.
But but but tyrod is the starter.
But but but tyrod is the starter.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 11:51 pm to public_enemy
quote:
But you swore Barkley would be the 1st overall pick.
Yep, and I’m sticking with it.
Don’t be so but but butt hurt public enemy lmfao
This post was edited on 3/20/18 at 11:52 pm
Popular
Back to top


1




