re: Pelicans Vs Knicks

quote:

---

Next year is irrelevant to the discussion of these current 21 games. How many more games do you think we win than what we have with this "better coach" you keep talking about? 2, 3 at most?

---

You completely ignored my question. Its not irrelevant- Willie is a problem (dating back to last year) maybe not even the main one- but hes a problem. If this helps get rid of Willie- Im fine with that.

I cant answer your question because we won’t know until we have a new coach. He may not be better but we also know that Willie is 4-17. Why not try something new? If we want to keep him for tanking purposes- I can understand posters saying this.

Again I ask do you think thats ok for Willie to be 4-17 and he deserves a pass for this season due to injuries?

quote:

---

The main problem is overweight and unavailable and has been since day one for Willie Green. That you can't immediately recognize this is wild. Willie has been playing solitaire with only 40 fricking cards in the deck.

---

I think not having Zion is an issue. I don’t think that means its ok for you to constantly lose every game this season because of it or other injuries. And now you’re losing games by 30 or more. There are limits. 4-17 is ridiculous.

quote:

---

Yes. The amount of injuries he's had to deal with is unprecedented for an nba team

---

Ok. So 4-17 is ok- injuries and all. At least you’re standing on what you say. Lets see if Griffin(assuming hes brought back) agrees with you. I think its “wild” you think thats ok but hey maybe 4-78 is ok too?

quote:

---

This is just you reaching to find something else to argue about.

---

Nah this response by you is just to focus the attention on me rather than you basically answering the question about what your limits are for Willie and his win/loss record this year because of injuries.

quote:

---

The amount of injuries we've had is ridiculous too right? It's why the record is, wait for it... ridiculous.

---

And wait for it you think Willie’s ridiculous coaching has absolutely nothing to do with it.

quote:

---

I'm good with this little debate we've had tonight. Enjoy your evening sir

---

Same to you. I’ll see you tomorrow posting a game thread against the hawks chastising people for getting on Willie.

quote:

---

We’ve lost 4 of our last 7 by 26+. Any coach could do better than that even with the roster that played the last 7 games.

---

I don't know this for certain. The players have been mostly bad (the ones that played). Maybe we could have made it more competitive and snuck out one or two more victories. But we aren't going to be a decent team with the players we have.

Fully healthy, this is a flawed team with huge chemistry and fit issues. Gutting the roster with injuries is just another nail in the coffin. We need so many things to line up for us to win or even keep a game close. Everyone fell short last night (including the coaching staff). Plenty of blame to go around.

It should start with our 3 stars that played last night. Total dog poo performance. We need all 3 to be great for us to have a chance (at least 2 out of 3). Plus we have to stop theirs. That never came close to happening. Those 3 guys went 3/18 on 3s. We don't have anyone else that can really shoot. You can't win in the NBA shooting like that..

quote:

---

Lol for what reason was my Pro Pels Talk thread deleted?? I know you don’t like my arse but abusing your admin responsibilities to delete a thread is a new low even for you.

---

I asked you to change it to rumors. You didn't. Your subject title was misleading.

If you want to repost it as rumors it won't be deleted. I'm just following site rules.

quote:

---

I asked you to change it to rumors. You didn't. Your subject title was misleading. If you want to repost it as rumors it won't be deleted. I'm just following site rules.

---

From the Help Board.

“Here are some of the main reasons for anchored threads:

1. The subject of the thread is too short and not descriptive enough. We often see users just put one word or sometimes two words. Even 3-4 words can be too short. These are immediately anchored. Again, be descriptive. The subject should contain the point of your thread.

2. The subject of the thread is cut off. This is a problem that has been popping up a lot lately. A user will post a subject such as:

"The key to winning the game is..."

or

"I am about to get torn to shreds but I think that"

For whatever reasons, the user cut the subject off and is requiring that the reader click on the thread to find out what the point of the thread is. We would rather the main idea of the thread to be inside the subject.

3. THE SUBJECT OR POST IS IN ALL CAPS. These are immediately anchored. All caps are hard to read and comes across as shouting.

4. There is already a thread on the info that you are posting. This is self-explanatory. We don't need 10 threads on the board announcing what Robert Smith just said about LSU. We usually keep the thread with the best subject, and anchor/delete the repeat threads.

5. The topic has been beaten to death. Sometimes, topics have run their course and need to just fade away.

6. A thread has gone off topic. If the replies inside a thread have nothing to do with the main idea in the subject, we often anchor.”

- Now where exactly would you say my thread would fall under?

- and just to be clear you deleted my whole thread because I didn’t change “info” to “rumors”???

quote:

---

Here are some of the main reasons for anchored threads:

---

Some not all reasons.

Your thread title was misleading. You said it was inside info. It's rumors from Podcasters that had their press pass revoked

quote:

---

my main subject I listed they had their credentials revoked and their information might be tainted

---

Then you should have changed your title accordingly.

You're welcome to post the same thing again with the subject titled as rumors instead of inside info.

quote:

---

Rumor is just an unverified piece of information. Me labeling the subject as “info” wasn’t wrong

---

You tried passing off multiple contradicting rumors as inside info. Several posters in the thread called out how contradicting all the info was. It's a misleading thread title. I asked you to change it. You didn't. It gets whacked.

If I post on the Rant about having "inside info" and then in the subject say I heard from a friend's friend that Kelly wants to leave LSU it would get whacked as well.

quote:

---

Its you using your admin powers to be a jackass- which isn’t the first time.

---

Anyone that disagrees with you bothers you immensely. Get help

quote:

---

have started a thread on the TD Help Board to revoke whatiknowsofar rights as an administrator. Other posters feel free to go on there to voice your own complaints. Having arguments on here shouldn’t taint an admins judgement on how to moderate threads.

---

And you lied in that thread too saying I deleted your thread without warning.