Started By
Message

re: WTF? Abraham Lincoln vampire hunter

Posted on 5/4/13 at 9:11 pm to
Posted by tigerfan84
Member since Dec 2003
26625 posts
Posted on 5/4/13 at 9:11 pm to
Worst thing that's ever happened to Abe Lincoln in a theater
Posted by Rougarou4lsu
New Orleans
Member since Oct 2003
3101 posts
Posted on 5/4/13 at 9:27 pm to
Well, don't be talking Crap about Abe.

Who are you to say he didn't fight vampires?

As for the British and....never mind
This post was edited on 5/4/13 at 9:46 pm
Posted by iluvdatiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2004
42971 posts
Posted on 5/4/13 at 10:02 pm to
just finished watching this movie. It was pretty silly.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
196905 posts
Posted on 5/4/13 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

As for the British and....never mind
very one sided war,,, Zulus thought they would be impervious to bullets
Posted by Evolve
Texas
Member since Aug 2012
3434 posts
Posted on 5/4/13 at 11:50 pm to
It's a movie, relax. Do you get upset at every movie that is not historically accurate? That would be just about every movie ever made.
Posted by Rougarou4lsu
New Orleans
Member since Oct 2003
3101 posts
Posted on 5/5/13 at 8:07 am to
History gets assraped once again....by you.

A depiction of the Battle of Isandlwana, taken from the Illustrated London News.
Date 22 January 1879
Result Decisive Zulu victory

Belligerents
British Empire Zulu Kingdom
British:
Casualties and losses
Over 1,300 killed:[4]
52 officers[5]
727 British regulars[5][6]
471 others including:[5]
133 European Colonial troops[7]
343 African Natal Native Contingent[8]
2 cannons captured 1,000 killed[9][10]
2,000 wounded

Battle of Isandlwana


The Battle of Isandlwana on 22 January 1879 was the first major encounter in the Anglo–Zulu War between the British Empire and the Zulu Kingdom. Eleven days after the British commenced their invasion of Zululand in South Africa, a Zulu force of some 20,000 warriors attacked a portion of the British main column consisting of about 1,800 British, colonial and native troops and perhaps 400 civilians.[11] The Zulus were equipped mainly with the traditional assegai iron spears and cow-hide shields,[12] but also had a number of muskets and old rifles[13] though they were not formally trained in their use.[14] The British and colonial troops were armed with the state-of-the-art[15] Martini-Henry breech-loading rifle and two 7 pounder artillery pieces as well as a rocket battery. Despite a vast disadvantage in weapons technology,[16] the numerically superior Zulus ultimately overwhelmed the poorly led and badly deployed[17] British, killing over 1,300 troops, including all those out on the forward firing line. The Zulu army suffered around a thousand killed.[18]

The battle was a crushing victory for the Zulus and caused the defeat of the first British invasion of Zululand.[19] The British Army had suffered its worst defeat against a technologically inferior indigenous force.[20] Isandlwana resulted in the British taking a much more aggressive approach in the Anglo–Zulu War, leading to a heavily reinforced second invasion[21] and the destruction of King Cetshwayo's hopes of a negotiated peace.[22]

Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 5/5/13 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Just ask any Republican about Bush's Presidency in retrospect. Hell, you're a political consultant in Texas if I recall correctly, so you must live with shite everyday.



Its funny because... wait it's not.

The movie wasn't bad at all, wasn't great. It was one of my annual, "There's a shitload of action, so I don't mind wasting time/money/brain cells to go see it" movies of the year.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram