- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/4/13 at 9:27 pm to OWLFAN86
Well, don't be talking Crap about Abe.
Who are you to say he didn't fight vampires?
As for the British and....never mind
Who are you to say he didn't fight vampires?
As for the British and....never mind
This post was edited on 5/4/13 at 9:46 pm
Posted on 5/4/13 at 10:02 pm to OWLFAN86
just finished watching this movie. It was pretty silly.
Posted on 5/4/13 at 10:10 pm to Rougarou4lsu
quote:very one sided war,,, Zulus thought they would be impervious to bullets
As for the British and....never mind
Posted on 5/4/13 at 11:50 pm to OWLFAN86
It's a movie, relax. Do you get upset at every movie that is not historically accurate? That would be just about every movie ever made.
Posted on 5/5/13 at 8:07 am to OWLFAN86
History gets assraped once again....by you.
A depiction of the Battle of Isandlwana, taken from the Illustrated London News.
Date 22 January 1879
Result Decisive Zulu victory
Belligerents
British Empire Zulu Kingdom
British:
Casualties and losses
Over 1,300 killed:[4]
52 officers[5]
727 British regulars[5][6]
471 others including:[5]
133 European Colonial troops[7]
343 African Natal Native Contingent[8]
2 cannons captured 1,000 killed[9][10]
2,000 wounded
Battle of Isandlwana
The Battle of Isandlwana on 22 January 1879 was the first major encounter in the Anglo–Zulu War between the British Empire and the Zulu Kingdom. Eleven days after the British commenced their invasion of Zululand in South Africa, a Zulu force of some 20,000 warriors attacked a portion of the British main column consisting of about 1,800 British, colonial and native troops and perhaps 400 civilians.[11] The Zulus were equipped mainly with the traditional assegai iron spears and cow-hide shields,[12] but also had a number of muskets and old rifles[13] though they were not formally trained in their use.[14] The British and colonial troops were armed with the state-of-the-art[15] Martini-Henry breech-loading rifle and two 7 pounder artillery pieces as well as a rocket battery. Despite a vast disadvantage in weapons technology,[16] the numerically superior Zulus ultimately overwhelmed the poorly led and badly deployed[17] British, killing over 1,300 troops, including all those out on the forward firing line. The Zulu army suffered around a thousand killed.[18]
The battle was a crushing victory for the Zulus and caused the defeat of the first British invasion of Zululand.[19] The British Army had suffered its worst defeat against a technologically inferior indigenous force.[20] Isandlwana resulted in the British taking a much more aggressive approach in the Anglo–Zulu War, leading to a heavily reinforced second invasion[21] and the destruction of King Cetshwayo's hopes of a negotiated peace.[22]
A depiction of the Battle of Isandlwana, taken from the Illustrated London News.
Date 22 January 1879
Result Decisive Zulu victory
Belligerents
British Empire Zulu Kingdom
British:
Casualties and losses
Over 1,300 killed:[4]
52 officers[5]
727 British regulars[5][6]
471 others including:[5]
133 European Colonial troops[7]
343 African Natal Native Contingent[8]
2 cannons captured 1,000 killed[9][10]
2,000 wounded
Battle of Isandlwana
The Battle of Isandlwana on 22 January 1879 was the first major encounter in the Anglo–Zulu War between the British Empire and the Zulu Kingdom. Eleven days after the British commenced their invasion of Zululand in South Africa, a Zulu force of some 20,000 warriors attacked a portion of the British main column consisting of about 1,800 British, colonial and native troops and perhaps 400 civilians.[11] The Zulus were equipped mainly with the traditional assegai iron spears and cow-hide shields,[12] but also had a number of muskets and old rifles[13] though they were not formally trained in their use.[14] The British and colonial troops were armed with the state-of-the-art[15] Martini-Henry breech-loading rifle and two 7 pounder artillery pieces as well as a rocket battery. Despite a vast disadvantage in weapons technology,[16] the numerically superior Zulus ultimately overwhelmed the poorly led and badly deployed[17] British, killing over 1,300 troops, including all those out on the forward firing line. The Zulu army suffered around a thousand killed.[18]
The battle was a crushing victory for the Zulus and caused the defeat of the first British invasion of Zululand.[19] The British Army had suffered its worst defeat against a technologically inferior indigenous force.[20] Isandlwana resulted in the British taking a much more aggressive approach in the Anglo–Zulu War, leading to a heavily reinforced second invasion[21] and the destruction of King Cetshwayo's hopes of a negotiated peace.[22]
Posted on 5/5/13 at 9:58 am to BigAppleTiger
quote:
Just ask any Republican about Bush's Presidency in retrospect. Hell, you're a political consultant in Texas if I recall correctly, so you must live with shite everyday.
Its funny because... wait it's not.
The movie wasn't bad at all, wasn't great. It was one of my annual, "There's a shitload of action, so I don't mind wasting time/money/brain cells to go see it" movies of the year.
Popular
Back to top


0







