- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Well, no shocker, but the "Hangover III" is probably going to suck
Posted on 6/12/12 at 9:10 pm to jiffyjohnson
Posted on 6/12/12 at 9:10 pm to jiffyjohnson
quote:
Lol my bad. They just made a completely different person up? Does that happen often in the comic book world? Does that mean Ryan Reynolds won't be playing the gay green lantern when the gay green lantern movie comes out?
actually no. Alan Scott is the Golden Age (40s) green lantern. Jordan came along in the late 50-early 60s and was part of the Green Lantern Corps. Alan Scott wasn't used for years. Hal Jordan is OG Justice League Member. They brought back the older heroes and now to "keep up with the times" they made Alan Scott gay. Kinda of like a new Spider-man was created and he's black/mexican.
0
Posted on 6/12/12 at 10:31 pm to OMLandshark
Of course it will, the second one was terrible!
Posted on 6/13/12 at 12:09 am to WB504
quote:
.there is the urban legend of a donkey show.
Clerks 2.
Good lord, are these guys ever original anymore?
Posted on 6/13/12 at 12:25 am to Ortho Reb
quote:no it wasnt.
Of course it will, the second one was terrible!
Posted on 6/13/12 at 12:27 am to JBeam
quote:
no it wasnt.
It's one of the worst sequels of all time and I think may be the laziest storytelling I have ever seen. The film was terrible.
Posted on 6/13/12 at 12:31 am to OMLandshark
i don't think it was terrible. Did it drag on? Yes.
But not terrible.
But not terrible.
Posted on 6/13/12 at 12:35 am to JBeam
quote:
But not terrible.
Read through this thread and come back to me:
LINK
Plus was Stu getting fricked in the arse by a Thai trannie necessary? At least I can fathom their stupid mindsets in the first one and why they did what they did. Who the frick goes out and gets fricked by a trannie. Maybe have Stu frick the trannie and be too drunk to realize that that's a man, but to have not only get fricked in the arse, but experience a simulataneous orgasm isn't funny. It's just fricking disgusting.
EDIT: I think Sophranos said it best in the last thread.
quote:
They have absolutely no respect for their customers and have no problems with insulting our intelligence. This was a giant, "frick you, you fricking moron sheep who will pay money to see the same thing just because of a brand name," event.
This post was edited on 6/13/12 at 12:38 am
Posted on 6/13/12 at 12:54 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Plus was Stu getting fricked in the arse by a Thai trannie necessary? At least I can fathom their stupid mindsets in the first one and why they did what they did. Who the frick goes out and gets fricked by a trannie. Maybe have Stu frick the trannie and be too drunk to realize that that's a man, but to have not only get fricked in the arse, but experience a simulataneous orgasm isn't funny. It's just fricking disgusting.
That part was offputting but didnt kill the movie for me
Posted on 6/13/12 at 6:52 am to OMLandshark
It amazes me when people expect a movie like this to be any more than it is.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News