Started By
Message

re: Saw Scream 4 last night

Posted on 5/4/11 at 8:26 am to
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150867 posts
Posted on 5/4/11 at 8:26 am to
The gf and I saw this over the weekend, and we both thought it was pretty terrible. Some thoughts (some of which echo things already said):

Self-aware movies are one thing. This one was just too over the top and stupid. I agree with whoever it was that said this was basically just a shitty remake of the original Scream (which we all seem to agree was awesome). Or a parody even, a la the Scary Movie franchise.

The killers. So puny high school kid and deranged tiny chick are the killers? Yeah, okay. When they killed the cops, at one point, they showed the killer and he/she was taller than Anthony Anderson by a good bit. Neither of those two kids were big or tall at all. Not to mention that neither one of them were strong enough to pull off some of the killings. Which leads me to...

Anthony Anderson's death scene. How stupid can you get? Someone gets stabbed directly in the head/brain with about a 6 inch blade, and he walks around for 30 seconds and tries fighting the air? Okay...

The cops. Dewey is an idiot. And the other cops were just as stupid, if not more so. Stupid decision after stupid decision solely to advance the plot, like someome said. And I agree that it worked in Scream when Dewey was just a young, bumbling idiot officer on a real police force. But in this one, I wasn't buying him as the sheriff for a fricking second.

Also, just because you reference the first movie ("Just like Billy and Stu..") doesn't mean that anything you do after that just magically works and becomes legitimate. Don't pretend like you're making a legit movie or sequel, and then shroud the entire thing with self-referential bullshite. I'd have been much happier if they'd have jsut called this Scary Movie 5 and told me beforehand that it was a comedy.

Bad movie, although somewhat redeemable in how easy it is to make fun of.


Posted by ipodking
#StopTalkingAboutWomensSports
Member since Jun 2008
56304 posts
Posted on 5/4/11 at 10:51 am to
quote:

The killers. So puny high school kid and deranged tiny chick are the killers? Yeah, okay. When they killed the cops, at one point, they showed the killer and he/she was taller than Anthony Anderson by a good bit. Neither of those two kids were big or tall at all. Not to mention that neither one of them were strong enough to pull off some of the killings


I thought the killers were totally believable. It doesn't take much strength to put a knife through somebody. Jill and Charlie both represented the screwed up/demented teenagers of today very well IMO.


This post was edited on 5/4/11 at 11:12 am
Posted by Dr Emmett Brown
Hill Valley, CA
Member since Dec 2010
447 posts
Posted on 5/9/11 at 12:11 pm to
*SPOILERS*










glad i went to see it in the theater at least.

that said, i was disappointed but it wasn't a total flop. i was in high school when the original came out, so maybe cuz i'm older i found myself not scared at all & saying things like, the garage door would not go down while she's under it. and... how is the 2 smallest people in the movie the killers???? did the chick even weigh over 100 lbs???

all in all, glad i saw it, but Sidney & Dewey should've been the killers...
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram