Started By
Message

re: Is Anna Paquin the best actress of my generation?

Posted on 8/13/09 at 12:21 am to
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60938 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 12:21 am to
quote:

Hillary Swank is too old, and I'm not a fan


Your age range was 18-35. Swank just turned 35.

Furthermore Angelina Jolie is 34.

You said before, this is based on acting success, not looks, therefore...

1. Hilary Swank
2. Angelina Jolie
3. Kate Winslet
4. Charlize Theron
5. Natalie Portman
6. Reese Witherspoon
7. Anne Hathaway
8. Rachel McAdams
9. Kiera Knightly
10. Rose Byrne
This post was edited on 8/13/09 at 12:22 am
Posted by Crimsonpanther13
Somewhere in Avoyelles Parish
Member since Oct 2008
7346 posts
Posted on 8/13/09 at 6:34 am to
Acting discussions are silly. It's the easiest thing to do in entertainment. Granted there are some terrible actors out there, but those are just anomalies like people who can't whistle. As an example though, look at how many people come off of some other kind of stardom and go to movies. And you realize...."Hey that guy is a good actor!" It's because the majority of human beings on this earth can do it. (Ice-T, Will Smith, Ice Cube, Justin Timberlake, Tim Mcgraw, Donnie and Mark Wahlberg, Dwight Yoakam, Queen Latifah, Nelly, The Rock<-- I guess technically he was already an actor, Shaq, Phil Fulmer, Nick Saban) Ok, the last 3 were jokes, but you get my drift. Now, look at actors that try to go become singers or rappers. This turns out bad everytime I've seen it.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram