- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 300: Rise of an Empire Trailer released today
Posted on 6/13/13 at 7:17 am to boom roasted
Posted on 6/13/13 at 7:17 am to boom roasted
quote:
Not historically accurate. Will not see.
I know right, Inglorious Basterds was terrible
Posted on 6/13/13 at 7:21 am to Tiger1242
quote:
I know right, Inglorious Basterds was terrible
Didn't see it. Not historically accurate.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:00 am to tigerfan in bamaland
My early question with this movie is why is it still called 300?
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:28 am to tigerfan in bamaland
That shite looks awesome and I will see it in the theaters.
I don't understand though. At the end of 300, they have 30,000 greeks chargeing the Persians.
Where does this story fit in with the sequel?
I don't understand though. At the end of 300, they have 30,000 greeks chargeing the Persians.
Where does this story fit in with the sequel?
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:30 am to Wild Thang
quote:
Where does this story fit in with the sequel?
quote:
The film stars returning actors Lena Headey and Rodrigo Santoro, as well as new leading man Sullivan Stapleton, and Eva Green. It looks like the film takes place concurrently with the first one, focusing on the Battle of Artemisium instead of the Battle of Thermopylae, which was the focus of the first film. The Battle of Artemisium was comprised of naval battles, hence the trailer's abundance of ships ramming into each other and bloody bodies falling into the ocean.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:32 am to boom roasted
quote:
Not historically accurate. Will not see.
Oh my god
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:32 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
Another shitty movie people will go see. Somehow how much history people know in the future is going to be severely effected by shitty movies sadly.
When trying to act too smart for an entertaining movie, you should probably learn the difference between the noun effect and the verb affect.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:41 am to TexasTiger1185
Do some of you frickers not understand sarcasm? I thought I was being pretty blatant.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:43 am to Wild Thang
I wonder if they will have Spartans commanding the ships. I read a bunch of shite about that war a long time ago, and from what I remember, the Athenians were entirely responsible for the naval battle that essentially won the war.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:47 am to tigerfan in bamaland
Gonna be hard to top the first one. God help me had there been a place to sign up for a branch of the military outside the theatre. I'd be enlisted right now; I was ready to throw down 
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:56 am to tigerfan in bamaland
Looks like it could be as bad as Sucker Punch. Or worse.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:56 am to Fearthehat0307
quote:
It looks like the film takes place concurrently with the first one, focusing on the Battle of Artemisium instead of the Battle of Thermopylae, which was the focus of the first film
That's confusing though. Why is Cersei in this movie if she was just chilling in Sparta while the battle in 300 was taking place? Plus, you can see the scar on Xerxes's face from the spear throw.
Either way, that trailer is badass.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:58 am to Tiger1242
quote:
Not historically accurate. Will not see.
I know right, Inglorious Basterds was terrible
I know you were being sarcastic, but Inglorious Basterds was not good.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:59 am to Wild Thang
quote:not sure haven't really looked into it. I guess either they will explain it or it will just be a major plot hole that carson can use to tell us how much it sucks
That's confusing though. Why is Cersei in this movie if she was just chilling in Sparta while the battle in 300 was taking place? Plus, you can see the scar on Xerxes's face from the spear throw.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 11:00 am to LoveThatMoney
quote:down vote
but Inglorious Basterds was not good.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 11:02 am to Fearthehat0307
quote:
down vote
I watched 300 in theaters and was totally jacked afterward. I really enjoyed it. Then I watched it a second time and I thought it dragged arse a bit. A final, third watch confirmed that the movie was complete shite, despite my initial impressions.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 11:05 am to LoveThatMoney
quote:I see I received a retaliation down vote
LoveThatMoney
Posted on 6/13/13 at 12:30 pm to tigerpimpbot
quote:
Damn, that looks fricking awesome.
this
can't wait to see it
Posted on 6/13/13 at 12:40 pm to Fearthehat0307
quote:
I see I received a retaliation down vote
Popular
Back to top



2






