Started By
Message

re: Will beating Notre Dame this bad put this team in the all time greats?

Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:10 am to
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36443 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:10 am to
quote:

quote:
Well clearly everyone else on this thread is an idiot because you are the only genius claiming Bama would win. The fact that you are bringing up Leianrt's pro career only reinforces how young and ignorant you are about football



2001 Miami sucked because of Ken Dorsey's shitty pro career too!


You think this dumbass punk even knows who Ken Dorsey and 2001 Miami is? Speaking of teams that would wax this years bama..
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36710 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:10 am to
quote:

The fact that you are bringing up Leianrt's pro career only reinforces how young and ignorant you are about football
when did that happen?
Posted by OFWHAP
Member since Sep 2007
5416 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:11 am to
I think I'm of the opinion that 2001 Miami would have beaten 2004 USC. Miami was just too stacked.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36443 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:12 am to
quote:

quote:
The fact that you are bringing up Leianrt's pro career only reinforces how young and ignorant you are about football

when did that happen?


quote:

I stand by my statement

Eta: Leinhart against this D?!



Sorry, you didnt directly bring up his pro career, but that was clearly you're insinuation since he was dominant in college and it was obvious you based your perception of him off his pro career.
This post was edited on 1/8/13 at 12:13 am
Posted by OFWHAP
Member since Sep 2007
5416 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:12 am to
Because you were laughing at the thought that a USC offense with Leinart at the helm would have beaten this year's Bama team. Leinart was a stud in college.
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36710 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:13 am to
quote:

b/c you were the genius that tried to write off USC by saying that their wins over Arkansas didnt count b/c McFadden was out. And please, keep using the word retard. I remember when I used it on the playground
in a year where they weren't elite?
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36443 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:13 am to
quote:

Because you were laughing at the thought that a USC offense with Leinart at the helm would have beaten this year's Bama team. Leinart was a stud in college.



This. You're obviously too young to remember how dominant he was in college. Much more prolific than McCarron
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36443 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:14 am to
quote:

in a year where they weren't elite?


Two years in a row, when they were supposed to be contenders for the SEC west...
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36710 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:14 am to
quote:

Arky and USC didn't play each other in 2004. Only '05 and '06.
I know. You were the one spouting off the victory against Ark before your edit.
Posted by OFWHAP
Member since Sep 2007
5416 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:14 am to
Arkansas won the SEC West in 2006. As in, potentially the greatest LSU team ever assembled didn't win the west that year. Yes, Arkansas was pretty good that year.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36443 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:15 am to
quote:

quote:
Arky and USC didn't play each other in 2004. Only '05 and '06.

I know. You were the one spouting off the victory against Ark before your edit.


Fine. As I said. the 05 USC team would have waxed Bama too
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36710 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:15 am to
quote:

Arky and USC didn't play each other in 2004. Only '05 and '06.
well then GFY
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36710 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:16 am to
quote:

This. You're obviously too young to remember how dominant he was in college. Much more prolific than McCarron
who the frick ever said anything about being a prolific passing offense?

It's about who you play
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36443 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:16 am to
quote:

quote:
Arky and USC didn't play each other in 2004. Only '05 and '06.

well then GFY


Fine. As I said. the 05 USC team would have waxed Bama too. The same USC team that beat a 'contender' Arky taem 7-17

Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36710 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:16 am to
quote:

Arkansas won the SEC West in 2006. As in, potentially the greatest LSU team ever assembled didn't win the west that year. Yes, Arkansas was pretty good that year.
we were talking about 2004 dumbass.
Posted by OFWHAP
Member since Sep 2007
5416 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:17 am to
I'm not sure which edit you're talking about.
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36710 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:17 am to
quote:

Fine. As I said. the 05 USC team would have waxed Bama too
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36710 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:18 am to
Well you had a few
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36443 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:18 am to
quote:

who the frick ever said anything about being a prolific passing offense?

It's about who you play


Now youre just deflecting. Its sad. 2004 USC beat Oklahoma 55-19 in the BCS title game. 2005 USC beat the supposed SEC contender Arkansas 70-17. Both FAR more impressive than any wins Bama had this season
Posted by OFWHAP
Member since Sep 2007
5416 posts
Posted on 1/8/13 at 12:18 am to
The only relevant edits I had were to add on to what I had already typed up. I'm not sure I changed anything of substance.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram