- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who are the most exciting CFB players to watch, which will be playing in 2012?
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:14 am to DucksflyinPAC
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:14 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
And not only that. When Chicken thinks of any icon or picture to rep the Outdoor board he uses a Duck. Thus, out of the only few boards he has on this site, he just uses icons that flag us Oregon Ducks on in here... A Chicken is a bird. You know what they say. Birds of a feather flock together.
You have just enered the world of the absured. 
1
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:14 am to FleurDeLonestar
Well girls, it's been fun, but I have some stuff I need to do.
Look for us in Miami for the Natty.
Look for us in Miami for the Natty.
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:16 am to dukke v
Might start a help board topic. 
Notice how he doesn't respond when a valid point of why DAT will not be good this year?
Notice how he doesn't respond when a valid point of why DAT will not be good this year? Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:17 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
Well girls, it's been fun, but I have some stuff I need to do.
Look for us in Miami for the Natty.
So you're busy until the next NCG? :fingerscrossed:
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:18 am to DucksflyinPAC
I think people are confusing things here. "Most exciting" does not necessarily = "best" player. For instance, guys like Matt Barkley and Marcus Lattimore may be some of the best but aren't always the most exciting to watch.
To me there are 3 names that immediately came to mind when I saw this:
Denard Robinson, Michigan QB
Sammy Watkins, Clemson WR
Tyrann Mathieu, LSU DB
Those are the ones that you are looking right at when they come on the field because you know any given play could be a special one.
To me there are 3 names that immediately came to mind when I saw this:
Denard Robinson, Michigan QB
Sammy Watkins, Clemson WR
Tyrann Mathieu, LSU DB
Those are the ones that you are looking right at when they come on the field because you know any given play could be a special one.
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:21 am to FleurDeLonestar
quote:
Might start a help board topic. Notice how he doesn't respond when a valid point of why DAT will not be good this year?
Child please. We have Barner. He is the PAC's leading top rusher going into 2012. He is a virtual carbon copy of LMJ. He will be split out left, DAT out right. Who they going go cover? And we have a dynamic speedy running QB this year. Key in to one guy and we make you pay...
And keying on DAT. Is there a guy out there that can even catch him?
Later Bitches. Have a nice day.
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:23 am to DucksflyinPAC
Still waiting for a reason why a fan of any of the traditional powers should be jealous or envious of Oregon football?
Other than the hot cheerleaders of course.
Other than the hot cheerleaders of course.
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:23 am to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
DucksflyinPAC
I'm starting to see why everyone hates you.
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:25 am to VABuckeye
quote:
Still waiting for a reason why a fan of any of the traditional powers should be jealous or envious of Oregon football?
He can't answer that. He knows of NOTHING but Oregon Football. Maybe a tad of USC, but east of that he is clueless.
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:26 am to DucksflyinPAC
sec teams that could beat oregon next year
Under/over 4.5
Over. 6
Under/over 4.5
Over. 6
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:30 am to dukke v
You're a fricking sociopath. Straight up.
Whoops, meant to reply to DucksFlyInPAC
Whoops, meant to reply to DucksFlyInPAC
This post was edited on 5/7/12 at 11:31 am
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:34 am to DucksflyinPAC
Since Barner is so durable that might just work. Oregon had a fast QB the last few years. Your point? You don't need to catch him. If the ball can't get to him, then he can't make a play.
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:38 am to GonzoLeslie
quote:
sec teams that could beat oregon next year Under/over 4.5 Over. 6
Oregon would be favored in all of them except Bama/LSU.
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:40 am to bisonduck
quote:
Oregon would be favored
Means nothing. They would lose half.
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:41 am to FleurDeLonestar
quote:
Since Barner is so durable that might just work. Oregon had a fast QB the last few years. Your point? You don't need to catch him. If the ball can't get to him, then he can't make a play.
Not true. The last two years we have had Darron Thomas. He was a slow running QB. The year before that we had Masoli. He was quick though. But before him we had the man, Dennis Dixon, the leading Heisman Candidate before tore his ACL near the end of season. And new QB is like Dixon. He will light it up! Just wait and watch...Miami, here we come...
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:41 am to FleurDeLonestar
quote:
Means nothing. They would lose half.
No. They wouldn't.
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:46 am to bisonduck
if oregon played in the sec, they'd be bowling in nashville
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:46 am to DucksflyinPAC
So 2 out of how many recent years there has been a "slow" QB? How many championship appearances have there been? 1 with a crushing loss to Auburn.
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:47 am to bisonduck
The green and yellow glasses are strong with this one.
Posted on 5/7/12 at 11:48 am to FleurDeLonestar
quote:
The green and yellow glasses are strong with this one.
Page 6 of 14
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News