- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is the logical argument for Bama > Auburn?
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:05 pm to RidiculousHype
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:05 pm to RidiculousHype
quote:
7 days ago they played and it was clear Auburn was better.
Meh, Auburn came ready to play for the Iron Bowl. They were the better team on the night tjey played. But let's not act like Auburn is clearly a better team. They just got stomped to UGA after stomping them the first time. So it's hard to truly tell who is "better".
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:05 pm to RidiculousHype
quote:
Logic only please
So a 3 loss non-champion should go over a 1 loss non-champion? Where is the logic?
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:06 pm to RidiculousHype
Can't put a 3 loss team in
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:09 pm to RidiculousHype
quote:
Why are we still using # of losses as the primary way to value a team?
Using your logic, UCF is a 0-loss team, so they should be #1 right?
Your logic is terrible. UCF does not play in a p5 conference. The p5 is in a completely different league than the G5. If an undefeated p5 team goes undefeated through the season, they will always be in the playoffs. Its that simple. Please don't overthink this.
Popular
Back to top
