Started By
Message

re: What is the logical argument for Bama > Auburn?

Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:05 pm to
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
16607 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

7 days ago they played and it was clear Auburn was better. 


Meh, Auburn came ready to play for the Iron Bowl. They were the better team on the night tjey played. But let's not act like Auburn is clearly a better team. They just got stomped to UGA after stomping them the first time. So it's hard to truly tell who is "better".
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6707 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Logic only please

So a 3 loss non-champion should go over a 1 loss non-champion? Where is the logic?
Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
68997 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:06 pm to
Can't put a 3 loss team in
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
16607 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Why are we still using # of losses as the primary way to value a team? 

Using your logic, UCF is a 0-loss team, so they should be #1 right?


Your logic is terrible. UCF does not play in a p5 conference. The p5 is in a completely different league than the G5. If an undefeated p5 team goes undefeated through the season, they will always be in the playoffs. Its that simple. Please don't overthink this.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram