- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What in the world is going down in Waco? (Update: Player found guilty of sexual assault)
Posted on 8/22/15 at 3:08 pm to tmc94
Posted on 8/22/15 at 3:08 pm to tmc94
quote:
in a non-homer opinion, they kicked him off the team and revoked his scholarship. Their problem was solved.
Again, absolutely not true. He was cleared to play for Boise the following year. The transfer approval form said he was my kicked off the team for any disciplinary action.
Posted on 8/22/15 at 3:11 pm to BeYou
quote:
This is a question that does need to be addressed nationwide. How should a school respond to this? Should they kick the player off campus and assume "guilty before innocent"?
Yes. Unquestionably.Title IX investigations only require it be more likely than not. A grand jury indictment itself is enough suspicion that you should boot him. That means non-partisan people have heard enough evidence that they think it's more likely than not he committed the crime.
It's why every other school in America boots a kid when he's indicted.
Posted on 8/22/15 at 3:13 pm to BaylorTiger
quote:
Again, absolutely not true. He was cleared to play for Boise the following year. The transfer approval form said he was my kicked off the team for any disciplinary action.
he was cleared to attend Boise you doof. It makes no mention of football activity. Petersen very publicly gave him the boot. Quit spinning
LINK
Posted on 8/22/15 at 3:20 pm to tmc94
quote:
A grand jury indictment itself is enough suspicion that you should boot him.
In Texas 100% of accusations go to trial. All you need is a statement. To the other ag poster he was cleared to play. He was dismissed and then reinstated. Ultimately transferred. Find an updated link? Or maybe you're right, just spin. You should be familiar with that...top 5 arrests in off season, no?
Posted on 8/22/15 at 3:22 pm to BaylorTiger
this is false. It was a grand jury indictment
Posted on 8/22/15 at 3:23 pm to tmc94
quote:
in a non-homer opinion, they kicked him off the team and revoked his scholarship. Their problem was solved. They didn't need to find a landing spot for him because it's no longer their issue. Continuing to bring up Boise or Petersen is a red herring.
Yet Petersen says he called Briles looking for a landing spot for him. If Petersen is such an outstanding guy, which everyone agrees he is, why would he try to place a troubled kid into another program? Petersen either didn't know about Sam U violent past, he knew and didn't think it was a concern, or he negligently recommended a violent person to another team. If what people say about his character is true, the last option is the hardest to believe. This doesn't excuse Baylor but it does provide some context to the notion that Baylor/Briles wasn't aware of Sam U violent past prior to his arrival at Baylor.
quote:
Maybe he's someone that deserved a second chance. I don't know anything else about him. But that second chance should have ended the day of the indictment. It just should have no matter what Chris Petersen did or didn't say and there is really no way to spin that. The fact that Briles even brought up Petersen shows he's trying to shirk his own responsibility here.
I don't necessarily disagree with you. I think colleges are in difficult positions. They need to protect themselves from potential lawsuits from the accuser if they turn out to be innocent. The problem is there is no standard set. Should players/non-athletes have scholarships pulled from them based off accusations? IDK, that seems seemingly harsh. Any crazy person could claim something against another student and have a scholarship revoked for a year+ while the case works its way through the legal system. What if a non-Baylor student accuses a student of rape. Should the student be off scholarship? What if the accusation turns out to be a hoax and the accused is a athlete (think mattress girl at Columbia)? I don't have answers and there is no easy answer.
quote:
This kid was indicted in June 2014 for raping a fellow student-athlete at Baylor. Everything that happened before that should have alerted Briles, Starr, and everyone in the Baylor administration that he was a danger. Choosing to remain ignorant at that point is exactly that...a choice. And that choice endangered Baylor students.
So the incident where he was drunk and punched a window at Boise should have alerted Starr, Briles, and everyone that he was going to turn into a rapist.
Posted on 8/22/15 at 3:28 pm to BeYou
quote:
this is false. It was a grand jury indictment
You're understanding of the legal system is quite astoute. Please tell me more.
In Texas. If you have a statement for domestic or sexual violence. You will go to trial 100% of the time. Yes, there's a process. Very good. Maybe you can use your expert knowledge to explain to us the probation verdict from the jury? Probation. For Rape.
Posted on 8/22/15 at 3:29 pm to tmc94
quote:
he was cleared to attend Boise you doof. It makes no mention of football activity. Petersen very publicly gave him the boot. Quit spinning
Petersen expected him to be back on the team.
quote:
“He’s got some personal things he’s taking care of,” Petersen said at the time, indicating that he expected Ukwuachu to remain with the team. (The video is below. Petersen’s answer comes around the 3:15 mark.)
LINK
Posted on 8/22/15 at 3:36 pm to BaylorTiger
quote:
Maybe you can use your expert knowledge to explain to us the probation verdict from the jury? Probation. For Rape.
let me help you out here
quote:
As a former prosecutor, I expected probation due to his limited criminal history and the likely conflicting evidence that came out at trial. 10 years probation is the maximum allowed by law no matter what the jail sentence at issue is.
The 180 days is probably what is referred to as "shock probation" which is what we used to call going to stare or county jail for 6 months before going on long-term probation. It is also a sign that if the probationer messes up, the judge is going to revoke his probation and send the maximum sentence.
The most important fact in play I have not seen mention - how many years of prison is at issue in the underlying conviction. That number reflects the probationer could go to jail if his probation is revoked. For example, the judgment might read - "25 years confinement in TDCJ, confinement is suspended and defendant is placed on community supervision for a term of 10 years." If he screwed up, failed a drug test, whatever, he could go to prison for a max of 25 years.
Thus, I expect the judge to have assigned the max sentence since he gave probation.
IF the judge didn't (and for example did 8 years probated for 10 years), I would view that as absolute bias as a BU grad and the prosecutor should be in complete uproar
Posted on 8/22/15 at 3:38 pm to BeYou
quote:
What if the accusation turns out to be a hoax and the accused is a athlete
An indictment by a grand jury, despite your friend's belief, is not based upon someone simply accusing him. It's based upon evidence presented to a jury to decide whether or not there is enough to proceed to trial. They look at the available evidence and if there isn't enough, they don't indict. Maybe they investigate further. Maybe it's dropped.
It doesn't make him guilty, but Baylor doesn't and shouldn't need guilt to take action protecting other students.
Posted on 8/22/15 at 3:42 pm to BeYou
Maybe. Again, I'm not sure why you keep circling back to what happened at Boise. It's irrelevant. He didn't even get arrested at Boise.
I'm not saying Briles had no reason to take him in. I've never said that. But somehow you keep going back to it because it's the only forgivable thing in this whole mess. I said the decision to keep him on after the rape indictment is egregious. The failure to circle back at that point and get all relevant information on him at Boise or anywhere else is not a small thing. It's willful ignorance.
I'm not saying Briles had no reason to take him in. I've never said that. But somehow you keep going back to it because it's the only forgivable thing in this whole mess. I said the decision to keep him on after the rape indictment is egregious. The failure to circle back at that point and get all relevant information on him at Boise or anywhere else is not a small thing. It's willful ignorance.
Posted on 8/22/15 at 3:45 pm to tmc94
quote:
An indictment by a grand jury, despite your friend's belief, is not based upon someone simply accusing him. It's based upon evidence presented to a jury to decide whether or not there is enough to proceed to trial. They look at the available evidence and if there isn't enough, they don't indict. Maybe they investigate further. Maybe it's dropped.
Isn't this an extremely low bar to reach? Aren't most cases found to have enough evidence to go to trial?
I am no knowledge of law.
Still not sure how I feel about treating someone as guilty before being proven guilty. Not sure how it would also affect liability Baylor could also face from the accuse if they end up being innocent.
quote:
Maybe. Again, I'm not sure why you keep circling back to what happened at Boise. It's irrelevant. He didn't even get arrested at Boise.
The entire point of the Boise discussion is to determine what Briles knew about Sam U history at Boise and what Petersen communicated to Briles. Most calling for Briles to be fired are doing so because they are saying he willingly brought in a troubled person with a violent past and put Baylor students at risk so his team could be better.
If Petersen told Briles, "Yea he beat his gf" and Briles still brought him in. Then Briles needs to be fired.
If Petersen didn't tell Briles about his Sam U violent past and only said he was kicked off for insubordination, missing practices/meetings, not following other team rules then Briles didn't necessarily knowingly bring a dangerous person to school and will likely keep his job.
This post was edited on 8/22/15 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 8/22/15 at 3:51 pm to tmc94
quote:
The failure to circle back at that point and get all relevant information on him at Boise or anywhere else is not a small thing. It's willful ignorance.
Baylor did circle back with Boise to an extent in its own internal investigation.

Posted on 8/22/15 at 3:59 pm to BeYou
quote:
Isn't this an extremely low bar to reach?
It is. The burden is the same as for Title IX. More likely than not.
quote:
Aren't most cases found to have enough evidence to go to trial?
Generally yes. Most prosecutors don't bring cases to GJ's without thinking they'll get a go-ahead. Usually it's a test run to make sure they aren't missing something key
quote:
The entire point of the Boise discussion is to determine what Briles knew about Sam U history at Boise and what Petersen communicated to Briles. Most calling for Briles to be fired are doing so because they are saying he willingly brought in a troubled person with a violent past and put Baylor students at risk so his team could be better.
I don't really care about Briles taking him in. Every coach brings in character risks. You'd hope they'd investigate fully beforehand (which Baylor clearly didn't) but what's far more important is how you handle it when something comes up.
Nothing about this case makes me think Baylor ever took this situation seriously. Not the horrible Title IX investigation (which the email you cited is from). Not the handling of it by the football staff. Not the handling after the fact. It's all been incredibly callous.
Posted on 8/22/15 at 4:11 pm to BaylorTiger
quote:
You're understanding of the legal system is quite astoute.
ouch
Posted on 8/22/15 at 4:12 pm to tmc94
There's a consolidated list floating around of all the players Briles has allowed to play despite violent criminal pasts and indictments.
It reflects very poorly on him.
It reflects very poorly on him.
Posted on 8/22/15 at 4:13 pm to BeYou
I think you're viewing the Petersen-Briles conversation from the wrong perspective. You seem to believe Petersen helped find Sam U a school closer to home once he left Boise. Almost like Petersen put a call into Baylor & told Briles he had a kid that was leaving the team to be closer to home. "He's had some problems here at Boise, but he's suffers from Depression & homesickness."
When in reality, I believe Petersen called Briles as soon as he found out Sam U was in the process of transferring to Baylor to WARN Briles about the kid. The call wasn't to help Sam U, but to help Baylor & Briles by informing him this was a bad guy. That's why people are saying Briles is in big trouble.
When in reality, I believe Petersen called Briles as soon as he found out Sam U was in the process of transferring to Baylor to WARN Briles about the kid. The call wasn't to help Sam U, but to help Baylor & Briles by informing him this was a bad guy. That's why people are saying Briles is in big trouble.
Posted on 8/22/15 at 4:14 pm to Roger Klarvin
Found it
quote:
Art Briles was caught in a lie when he told media that he was completely unaware of Ukwuachu's violent past and dismissal from Boise State's program when he welcomed him to Baylor's program and campus. Was Briles also unaware of Mike Orakpo's violent history and dismissal from Colorado State's program when he welcomed him to Baylor's program and campus? Was he aware of Tevin Elliot's violent character when he welcomed him to Baylor's campus? (see Jan 2014 - conviction for violent, serial rapes).
Was Briles aware of Daryl Stonum's three run-ins with the law (and two DUI convictions) when he welcomed him to Baylor's program and campus after being kicked out of Michigan's program? Was Briles aware that Ahmad Dixon had been arrested for criminal assault while he continued to play him during the 2013 season on the basis that he was not actually incarcerated at the time of the games?
Mike Orakpo, LB Orakpo was recruited to Baylor after being expelled from Colorado State University following an arrest for a savage beating that injured four people, two of them seriously, and led to a drug probe when police found evidence of drugs and anabolic steroid at his residence. According to a 90-page police report, a search of Orakpos and another expelled CSUs residence yielded foil packages marked as anabolic steroids, as well as hypodermic needles, nine unmarked vials, eight of them refrigerated, and three used syringes. Possession of anabolic steroids is a felony in Colorado (but apparently not in Waco). With full knowledge of Orakpo's issues, Briles welcomed him to Baylor.
LINK
Tevin Elliot, DE - Baylor player recruited by Briles who was sentenced to twenty years in prison and a $10,000 fine after being convicted in January 2014 of raping and sexually assaulting four Baylor women, including a freshman girl twice at a party at a Waco apartment complex. Prosecutor LaBorde called Elliott a violent serial rapist who cant admit he did anything wrong because he doesnt think he did anything wrong. Briles called Elliott a sweet young man who was a good football player and deserved a second chance.
According to an arrest warrant affidavit, one of the victims, who was a freshman student at Baylor University, told officers she went to the party on April 15 at the Aspen Heights apartments at 3344 South 3rd St. and while there, met Elliott. At some point, Elliott asked her to go outside with him and although she said she didn't want to go, she told officers he was persistent, the affidavit said. As they went outside, the affidavit said, Elliott "picked up the victim and took her to the pool area and volleyball court area where she was sexually assaulted twice" telling Elliott on several occasions "she did not want this." The victim later returned to the party and told an unidentified witness about the attack. That person took her to Hillcrest Baptist Medical Center, the affidavit said, and police were called a short time later.
LINK
Josh Gordon, WR arrested by police after being found stoned and asleep in the Taco Bell drive-thru at 3:30 am on Wed night prior to game with Tech. Briles played Gordon against Tech (but held him out of warm ups and Baylor's first drive as punishment) and said he was sticking by him because he was his kind of player. Gordon eventually left the Baylor program because of his third arrest for drugs in Waco, transferred to Utah where he never played because of failing another drug test and ended up at San Diego State. However, Baylor claims Gordon as one of the players it has put in the NFL. Gordon was suspended from the Cleveland Browns for a year for failing yet another drug test.
Daryl Stonum, WR kicked out of Michigan following his third run-in with the law in three years at Michigan. When dismissed, Stonum was just coming off a season-long suspension in response to his second DUI arrest. Briles welcomed Stonum to Baylor's progam and campus.
Lache Seastrunk, RB Recruited to Baylor under questionable circumstances after initially signing with Oregon after street-Dr Fistula Willie Lyles was found to have accepted a $25K payment for delivering the recruit and leaving Oregon under investigation by a toothless NCAA.
Shawn Oakman, DE Recruited to Baylor after kicked out of Penn States football program (and they put up with a lot at PSU) for theft.
Sam Ukwuachu, DE Recruited to Baylor after being kicked out of Boise State following an arrest and an unspecified violation of team rules. Ukwuachu started in 12 games for Boise State as a freshman and was named a freshman All-American; however, he is no longer welcome at Boise State. Briles welcomed Ukwuachu to Baylor's football program and campus.
Ahmad Dixon, DB Dixon was represented by a street Dr Fistula during his recruitment and surprisingly decommitted from Texas to sign with Baylor, the first 4-star player to sign with Baylor during their streak of winless seasons. Dixon was arrested for criminal assault last last September during the season. According to the Waco Police Department, the 21-year-old male victim arrived at an apartment where Dixon and his friends were playing video games on the night of Sept. 16. Dixon became angry and began to assault the victim, punching him numerous times in his face and head causing pain and injury and a possible concussion. The victim waited until the next day to report the assault after Dixon made threats to the victim and victims family . Waco police arrested Dixon who was subsequently bonded out of McLennan County Jail. Briles continued to play Dixon during every game that season because he was not actually incarcerated at the time of the games.
LINK
This post was edited on 8/22/15 at 4:15 pm
Posted on 8/22/15 at 4:16 pm to Roger Klarvin
More
quote:
Antareis Bryan - Dallas police have arrested a Baylor football player. Antareis Bryan, a Dallas native, has been charged with aggravated robbery. He was booked into the Dallas County jail early Saturday morning on a $25,000 bond. Bryan is a starter who started every game for the Bears during 2009 and 2010.
Willie Andrews, DB - A Baylor football player was arrested and charged with possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and operating an unregistered motor vehicle. Andrews was seen driving a black Ford Crown Victoria when police received a call that there was possible drug activity in the area. Police found $6,800 in cash and a 1/2 pound of marijuana in Andrews' unregistered car.Subsequently, Andrews was arrested at his home and charged with assault with a dangerous weapon and unlawful possession of a firearm when police responded to a call that Andrews allegedly pointed a handgun at his girlfriend's head during an argument. The handgun Andrews allegedly used was found near a dumpster at Andrews apartment complex. Andrews had previously been sentenced to 30 days in jail after pleading guilty to a misdemeanor gun charge. The gun was found in his car by Texas State Troopers during a traffic stop. At the time, Andrews was serving a two year probation.
Robbie Rhodes, WR Rhodes was arrested on drug charges and evidence tampering in May 2014. Because Rhodes attempted to hide the drugs after being apprehended, he was also charged with tampering with physical evidence. Briles said the matter would be addressed internally and added that he expected Rhodes, who is a starter, to start every game next fall so long as he is not incarcerated at game time. However, after Briles presented evidence to the McLennan County prosecutor showing that Rhodes had once previously passed a drug test at a prior time in his life, the prosecutor said that he was dropping all charges including the evidence tampering charge due to the fact that Rhodes was too important to Waco and to Baylors football program. Rhodes was a four-star member of BUs 2013 recruiting class, rated as the No. 8 wide receiver in the country and the No. 8 player in the talent-rich state of Texas at any position. With the legal path now cleared, Rhodes is expected to be a significant contributor to Baylors high-octane offense in 2014.
LINK .
June 2014 Update: Unable to subsist for three weeks without narcotics, Rhodes fails yet another drug test only days after getting his May drug charges dropped and is released from the team, which raises even more questions. First, how many drug tests do you have to fail to get kicked out of Baylor? Hundreds? It should be noted that Rhodes never even passed out in the Taco Bell drive-thru, so why was he kicked off the team? But the biggest question is: knowing that when player-criminals from Michigan, Penn State, Oregon, Colorado State, Boise State, Huntsville, etc, are booted out of school they transfer to Baylor, where is it that player-criminals from Baylor transfer to? Guantanamo?
Cordell Dorsey, Safety - An Abilene Cooper football standout who has committed to play for Baylor University was arrested Wednesday for alleged aggravated sexual assault of a child. In addition to his arrest, 18-year-old Cordell Dashun Dorsey has been suspended from Coopers football team indefinitely, Abilene ISD Superintendent Heath Burns said in a written statement. Cordell Dorsey has a verbal commitment to Baylor University and was recruited by Baylor Head Coach Art Briles.
Posted on 8/22/15 at 4:17 pm to BeYou
quote:
Still not sure how I feel about treating someone as guilty before being proven guilty. Not sure how it would also affect liability Baylor could also face from the accuse if they end up being innocent.
You've brought this up a couple of times and I've kind of skipped it but I shouldn't.
Guilty/Not guilty has nothing to do with this situation. It's a football scholarship. They are renewed annually. Baylor can drop the kid because they don't like the way he parts his hair.
But beyond that, they have a duty via Title IX to protect the student body. If there is reason to believe that a student poses a threat to others, they don't just have a right, they are required to do something about it.
Virtually everything in this country not in criminal court is based upon preponderance of evidence. IOW, do you think it's more likely than not. That's the only test Baylor need apply
Popular
Back to top
