- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tiger gonna WD???
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:06 pm to Wild Thang
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:06 pm to Wild Thang
Keep arguing your point. I swear I'm listening to your argument.
quote:
Jack Nicklaus - 18
Tiger Woods - 14
Walter Hagen - 11
Ben Hogan - 9
Gary Player - 9
Tom Watson - 8
Bobby Jones - 7
Arnold Palmer - 7
Gene Sarazen - 7
Sam Snead - 7
Harry Vardon - 7
Nick Faldo - 6
Lee Trevino - 6
Seve Ballesteros - 5
James Braid - 5
Byron Nelson - 5
J.H. Taylor - 5
Peter Thomson - 5
Willie Anderson Jr. - 4
Jim Barnes - 4
Ernie Els - 4
Raymond Floyd - 4
Bobby Locke - 4
Phil Mickelson - 4
2
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:07 pm to KingRanch
quote:
you old.
That 3 years till 30 gonna fly by and then you gonna be old as frick. Deal with it.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:07 pm to Wild Thang
quote:
Well then. Tiger's prime >>>>> Jack's prime
Like I said.
Thanks for the info.
no problem. it's very obvious that tiger's prime was better. every stat in the game supports it. some people just can't accept it.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:08 pm to unbeWEAVEable
quote:
Keep arguing your point. I swear I'm listening to your argument.
I was just highlighting the Tiger ones. My point was comparing the two primes. Are you drunk again?
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:09 pm to unbeWEAVEable
quote:
unbeWEAVEable
not sure what you are arguing
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:09 pm to Wild Thang
quote:
Are you drunk again?
I'm gettin' there..
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:10 pm to BRgetthenet
These people probably think Webb Simpson is a hall a famer. Ogilvy too. Hell lets put VandeVelt to help the tiger side of this. Jack will have played vs well over half the the hall of famers Tiger did.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:10 pm to Wild Thang
quote:
I was just highlighting the Tiger ones. My point was comparing the two primes. Are you drunk again?
WTF are you talking about? I highlighted the Jack ones. The arguement was playing against stiffer competition...as lsugolf said that "it was easier to win back then"...
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:10 pm to lsugolf1105
quote:
not sure what you are arguing
The same thing you and I have been arguing.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:13 pm to VegasPro
And don't forget Jack's clubs. And all the advances is technology.
Plus, lawn mowers were different too, which gave a different lie from the fairway than they do today.
Plus, lawn mowers were different too, which gave a different lie from the fairway than they do today.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:14 pm to VegasPro
quote:
Jack will have played vs well over half the the hall of famers Tiger did.
I think you mean twice the hall of famers Tiger has, and yes, you are correct. That's why I don't get the argument that golfers are better today than yesteryear. More fit, yes. Fit isn't a major issue for golf.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:15 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
I think you mean twice the hall of famers Tiger has, and yes, you are correct. That's why I don't get the argument that golfers are better today than yesteryear. More fit, yes. Fit isn't a major issue for golf.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:16 pm to kywildcatfanone
The reason why so many can win is equipment has helped the average tour players so much. They can catch one hot weekend with the flat stick and win. Back in the day you to strike the ball perfectly and putt great to win. You had to play better to win.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:17 pm to VegasPro
quote:
These people probably think Webb Simpson is a hall a famer. Ogilvy too. Hell lets put VandeVelt to help the tiger side of this. Jack will have played vs well over half the the hall of famers Tiger did.
Besides spelling van de velde wrong how do you know Webb Simpson won't be a hall of famer? All the people arguing that jack played against guys who won more majors are forgetting the fact their careers are complete while Tigers competitors aren't done adding to their totals. And the fact those older guys have more majors because there was less competition outside of the top 10 to actually win a major
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:18 pm to TigerPhan27
I will give u 20-1 odds with a 1k bet that he doesn't make hall of fame. Lol
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:19 pm to VegasPro
quote:
I will give u 20-1 odds with a 1k bet that he doesn't make hall of fame. Lol
Ok lol
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:19 pm to TigerPhan27
So now they can add to their total easier? I thought it was tougher competition. O man.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:19 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
That's why I don't get the argument that golfers are better today than yesteryear. More fit, yes.
because it was easier to win a major back then. go read my earlier post. the top american golfers didn't play in the British open back then. the pga had 50 pga club pros in the field.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:19 pm to TigerPhan27
quote:
Tigers competitors aren't done adding to their totals.
True, but how many of these current guys do you really think will have 4+ majors. One, maybe?
Page 7 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News