- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This is why Super Bowl rings are mostly irrelevant
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:27 am to lsupride87
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:27 am to lsupride87
quote:
Agreed. If Lynch scores what changed about Brady?
He was about to lose another Super Bowl on a fluke play after leading another potential game-winning drive.
0
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:32 am to ZeeDustin
quote:For the most part, you're right here.
I mean I guess we are looking at ur post wrong. Does it make him greater he won? Maybe maybe not. But does it change his legacy? Yes.
Again personally, just my take, his legacy is based on how good I think he is, not really how many MVPs he won, SB MVPs, or Super Bowls. There's a difference IMO. I just judge what I saw in the games. An award a sportswriter or whoever decided on that gave a player is irrelevant to me. Super Bowl wins are relevant in that if you're that good, odds are you'll win 1 or more, but there are outliers that downplay the significance of the(Marino/Bradshaw the 2 obvious ones)
But generally speaking, you're on the right track to my premise for the most part.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:35 am to shel311
I was hammered drunk and couldn't hear the announcers during the game... but
Why the frick weren't the Pats taking timeouts at the end to preserve some time for Brady?
Why the frick weren't the Pats taking timeouts at the end to preserve some time for Brady?
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:37 am to shel311
quote:
irrelevant to my point.
So you are saying that Seattle LOST the game and NE didn't WIN the game....
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:38 am to BayouBengals03
Belli said their offense looked unorganized so he gambled on a bad play call.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:38 am to ZeeDustin
quote:
Belli said their offense looked unorganized so he gambled on a bad play call.
For real?
Awesome.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:39 am to shel311
quote:
Again personally, just my take, his legacy is based on how good I think he is, not really how many MVPs he won, SB MVPs, or Super Bowls.
I agree with your premise but you're intelligent enough to understand that what you're debating here reflects "one man's opinion" and the masses look at SB rings, MVP's, & career wins/stats.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:44 am to BayouBengals03
quote:I wasn't hammered drunk lol. But I don't pay much attention to play by play, but Belichick woulda gotten hammered ahd SEA scored there, and rightfully so.
Why the frick weren't the Pats taking timeouts at the end to preserve some time for Brady?
So to answer your question, uhh I don't know.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:44 am to dukke v
quote:No, NE won and SEA lost.
So you are saying that Seattle LOST the game and NE didn't WIN the game
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:45 am to Judge Smails
quote:Oh I definitely understand.
I agree with your premise but you're intelligent enough to understand that what you're debating here reflects "one man's opinion" and the masses look at SB rings, MVP's, & career wins/stats
But if thist thread can just change 1 person's opinion, it would be all worth it!!!
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:45 am to shel311
Seattle got that lucky arse catch and shouldn't have even been on the goal line. The ball don't lie though, and the pats got it back.
How it happened may have been sketchy, but the end result is what should have happened.
How it happened may have been sketchy, but the end result is what should have happened.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:46 am to shel311
This thread is basically equivalent to saying, "Winning is mostly irrelevant."
I mean, win or lose, the players are just as good either way. Right?
I mean, win or lose, the players are just as good either way. Right?
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:50 am to shel311
You said it was irrelevant.
It's not. Actually is probably his most relevant.
So I figured something had you on tilt to make that comment. Also, loving Brady doesn't mean you bet on NE.
It's not. Actually is probably his most relevant.
So I figured something had you on tilt to make that comment. Also, loving Brady doesn't mean you bet on NE.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:50 am to Patrick_Bateman
quote:Let me make an extreme hypothetical and you can use it to answer that question:
This thread is basically equivalent to saying, "Winning is mostly irrelevant."
I mean, win or lose, the players are just as good either way. Right?
Regular season brady is the exact same thing, he performed exactly the same in every game of his career. But he played on a team that gave up 50 points exactly in every game of his career.
Is regular season Brady not as good in that scenario as regular season Brady in reality? I don't think there's one shred of a difference between the 2 Bradys.
Or you can do it with the defense never giving up a single point in his career, either way you like, it doesn't change how good Brady is.
I've brought up Marino/Bradshaw probably close to 10 times in this thread and I don't think anyone has responded to it yet. How relevant is winning those Super Bowls in your determination of who is better between Marino and Bradshaw? I'm guessing not very, right?
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:51 am to GeeOH
quote:False
You said it was irrelevant
quote:Disagree
It's not. Actually is probably his most relevant
quote:I only bet on basketball, daily.
So I figured something had you on tilt to make that comment. Also, loving Brady doesn't mean you bet on NE
This post was edited on 2/2/15 at 7:52 am
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:55 am to shel311
quote:
Brady is no better or worse because Pete Carroll made the biggest coaching gaffe in the history of coaching gaffes.
3 rings, 4 rings, he's literally no different of a QB, no better or worse.
They were down 10 points late in the superbowl and he drove his team down the field for 2 touch downs on the last two drives to win the SUPER BOWL. Like it or not, Brady is Montana status now. Actually he passes Montana in my book, in terms of Greatness.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:59 am to Palm Beach Tiger
quote:I had him ahead of Montana probably multiple seasons ago, so I'm not sure why you'd say "like it or not"
Like it or not, Brady is Montana status now
Actually he passes Montana in my book, in terms of Greatness.
I have him #2 overall, so it's definitely getting lost in translation into thinking I'm downplaying Brady.
This post was edited on 2/2/15 at 8:00 am
Posted on 2/2/15 at 8:03 am to shel311
quote:
so I'm not sure why you'd say "like it or not"
that was for me actually.
I'm not a fan of Brady and now will say he is the Greatest QB ever. I do think other QB's are more skilled then he is......Peyton, Elway, Marino.... Just saying I do now think Brady is the "Greatest" so to speak......and I don't like it. lol
Posted on 2/2/15 at 8:05 am to Palm Beach Tiger
quote:Ahh, gotcha.
saying I do now think Brady is the "Greatest" so to speak......and I don't like it. lol
I gotr Rodgers 1, Brady 2.
I've never seen anyone play at a level as high as Rodgers for a sustained period of time.
Posted on 2/2/15 at 8:05 am to shel311
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/2/15 at 8:13 am
Page 9 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News