- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/19/10 at 8:11 am to The Hamburglar
quote:
first place
Right there with you!

Posted on 3/19/10 at 8:55 am to Htown Tiger
[
Same here, but this is typical me...start off strong, then plummet.
quote:
Right there with you!
Same here, but this is typical me...start off strong, then plummet.
Posted on 3/19/10 at 9:18 am to DanglingFury
First place here to even with a bad night
Posted on 3/19/10 at 9:31 am to Weaver
2 games back of 1st place.
41st place.




41st place.




Posted on 3/19/10 at 9:34 am to TexasSinger
fricking Georgetown
Rank 235, honestly, a lot better than I thought given that I started like 1-6

Rank 235, honestly, a lot better than I thought given that I started like 1-6

Posted on 3/19/10 at 10:00 am to The Hamburglar
I'm also tied for 1st
Posted on 3/19/10 at 10:10 am to charlottetiger
Sorry arse paper prognosticator. I'd been better off letting my soon to be 4 yr old granddaughter picking. Geesous age crossandwich. 

Posted on 3/19/10 at 1:01 pm to RileyTime
11th place....
I normally suck at these things. I like too many underdogs.

I normally suck at these things. I like too many underdogs.
Posted on 3/19/10 at 1:02 pm to TexasSinger
quote:
41st place.
Same here

Posted on 3/19/10 at 1:53 pm to RaginCajunsULL
Stick a fork in me. I'm done. 

Posted on 3/19/10 at 1:55 pm to DanglingFury
I am still in first, but G'Town will hurt me in points.
So far: 13 of 16 games right.
It looks like Purdue is stronger than I thought without their leading scorer. I had not yet seen Siena play. I was going on their past teams. They dont have size this year.
So far: 13 of 16 games right.
It looks like Purdue is stronger than I thought without their leading scorer. I had not yet seen Siena play. I was going on their past teams. They dont have size this year.
Posted on 3/19/10 at 3:00 pm to ottothewise
I moving like the Jeffersons, on up.
Posted on 3/19/10 at 3:15 pm to ottothewise
someone please explain
if one or another person has picked the same number of games correctly, how can one or another person have more potential points?
THIS WAS ANSWERED< THANK YOU.
if one or another person has picked the same number of games correctly, how can one or another person have more potential points?
THIS WAS ANSWERED< THANK YOU.
This post was edited on 3/19/10 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 3/19/10 at 3:38 pm to ottothewise
because you had a team eliminated that you had advancing farther than them.......
Posted on 3/19/10 at 3:40 pm to ottothewise
quote:
if one or another person has picked the same number of games correctly, how can one or another person have more potential points?
If you had Gtown advancing to the Elite 8 and someone else had them only going to the Sweet 16 and losing there, then they could potentially still earn those Elite 8 pts that you cannot. Thus, their potential remaining points are higher than yours.
Posted on 3/19/10 at 4:30 pm to Htown Tiger
Picking correctly at a 74% clip right now. If I stay north of 70% for the tournament, pigs really will fly. 

Posted on 3/19/10 at 4:36 pm to TexasSinger
damnit, had Mizzou over Clemson in my printed bracket but on this Yahoo one I accidentally went the other way.
I would be tied for first place right now if I hadn't screwed that up

I would be tied for first place right now if I hadn't screwed that up

Posted on 3/19/10 at 4:55 pm to oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
Hi. I reckon you changed your handle.
Anyway, I have a question.
I observe that me and one other person are co-leaders, by reason of more correctly predicted outcomes.
However, one of the guys who has one more loss than I have, is said by the system to have the POTENTIAL, for winning more points than I can possibly win.
How can that be? All the games at a given level are of equal value and are counted at the same instant for every player.
Anyway, I have a question.
I observe that me and one other person are co-leaders, by reason of more correctly predicted outcomes.
However, one of the guys who has one more loss than I have, is said by the system to have the POTENTIAL, for winning more points than I can possibly win.
How can that be? All the games at a given level are of equal value and are counted at the same instant for every player.
Popular
Back to top
