- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rafael Nadal: The playing style of Pete Sampras was not enjoyable to watch
Posted on 6/29/11 at 9:45 am to theunknownknight
Posted on 6/29/11 at 9:45 am to theunknownknight
Sampras was a better all around player than Nadal because Pete had a much bigger serve and a serve and volley game.
Posted on 6/29/11 at 9:50 am to Tbobby
quote:
Sampras was a better all around player than Nadal because Pete had a much bigger serve and a serve and volley game.
Curious how that makes him a better all-around player.
Posted on 6/29/11 at 9:55 am to FootballNostradamus
Sampras had a complete game. Nadal is just a ground stroker. I'd even say Sampras' ground stroking was better than Nadal's.
Posted on 6/29/11 at 10:33 am to Tbobby
quote:
Sampras had a complete game. Nadal is just a ground stroker. I'd even say Sampras' ground stroking was better than Nadal's.
LMAO
Posted on 6/29/11 at 10:35 am to Tbobby
Yeah..you are a retard. No way in hell Sampras had a better stroke then Rafa.
Posted on 6/29/11 at 12:35 pm to CajunFootball
just like yall want to see sampras and nadal on grass, i want to see sampras and nadal on clay 

Posted on 6/29/11 at 2:55 pm to theunknownknight
I agree with Nadal, I've tuned in more recently to watch Nadal and Federer than I ever did with Sampras.
Sampras just destroyed people in his prime but when he lost it, he lost it.
Federer does seem to be coming back to the pack a little now but him vs Nadal has been the best thing for the sport
Sampras just destroyed people in his prime but when he lost it, he lost it.
Federer does seem to be coming back to the pack a little now but him vs Nadal has been the best thing for the sport
Posted on 6/29/11 at 3:05 pm to chalmetteowl
I think Nadal takes him on clay, and Sampras on grass.
Posted on 6/29/11 at 3:19 pm to CajunFootball
quote:
I think Nadal takes him on clay, and Sampras on grass.
Come on CajunFootball! Think Nadal takes him on Clay? Sampras would have to play one of his best clay court matches ever to win 6 games.
It'd look something like 6-2, 6-1, 6-1 IMO
Posted on 6/29/11 at 3:23 pm to FootballNostradamus
Nadal at his 2008 level would bagel Sampras at least once on clay IMHO
Posted on 6/29/11 at 3:40 pm to TulaneTigerFan
quote:
Nadal at his 2008 level would bagel Sampras at least once on clay IMHO
Yea I was gonna give one of the all-time greats a break and was worried people would jump down my through if I threw up a 6-0, but I definitely agree with you.
Posted on 6/29/11 at 3:43 pm to FootballNostradamus
Federer got bageled in the FO final that year and only won 4 games total. Sampras would have done worse
Posted on 6/29/11 at 3:53 pm to TulaneTigerFan
yeah, itd be a bloodbath
Sampras owned Kafelnikov his whole career and still got embarrassed when they played at the French
Sampras owned Kafelnikov his whole career and still got embarrassed when they played at the French
Popular
Back to top
